Thread regarding Splunk Inc. layoffs

Anxious about the buyout

My personal opinion is that neither Splunk nor Cisco will be better off if a buyout happens. Moreover, it is not at all clear to me why Cisco's leadership thought that a takeover of Splunk was a good idea. Any thoughts?

by
| 1212 views | | 4 replies (last )
Post ID: @OP+1fjWUmt1

4 replies (most recent on top)

Splunk HAD a good product once. But it ain't enough they wasted 8 years going to the cloud which wiped out their time and money and it's been disastrous.

by
|
Post ID: @6sdl+1fjWUmt1

LOL at anon post saying Splunk has a good product. Splunk has been lying to investors for years. Splunk does not have a good product.

by
|
Post ID: @2aum+1fjWUmt1

Splunk is not profitable. If the deal happens there are going to be synergies. The most obvious areas are: finance, HR, IT. These are areas where there are redundancies.

by
|
Post ID: @1jyt+1fjWUmt1

Splunk has a good product and intellectual property as a mid sized tech company they can't survive in the public markets. Competition is too fierce they had to be sold to survive. Period.

by
|
Post ID: @1uza+1fjWUmt1

Post a reply

: