This is the management style of this company - doing nothing to keep good employees, considering them absolutely replaceable, and when they leave, replace them with new and cheaper employees.
Do they really think this is sustainable in the long run?
Do they really think that this is a solution and that it does not have a disastrous impact on the future of the company in general?
4 replies (most recent on top)
hey mr. anonymous and your vacuous comment regarding grammer, hate to expose you to reality. if you are with cgg or tgs, stay there. they are the winners. so sorry about the caps. take my word for it. i have more experience than you have.
These days, it's not exactly a challenging job.
Most of it is now dull and can be done by cheap labour.
Take my Word for it wins for an answer to the question, and an ability to express an idea.
In reply to the second post, with that quality of grammar and punctuation, you will have no problem being employed by CGG.
consider this. technical prowess is most pronounced and valuable to a company during a time period between when an employee is obsessed with learning and applying and a few years after a plateau is reached. after that, once exuberance is gone and an employee seeks to depend on past achievements, a new employee becomes more valuable than one with three to seven years. newer and cheaper employees then are integral to feeding the technical machine. it is a folk tale or wishful thinking that equity is built with a corporation through technical prowess, excepting for a few high priests of science. those seeking to enter from below achieve what you know within a few short years and the cycle repeats. in other words it is 'what have you done for me lately?'. answer, no disastrous impact.