Thread regarding Canon Inc. layoffs

CUSA Playing The Long Game

I’ve been at CUSA for about 7-8 years now and have been a part of 3 different CEO’s, COVID, full time in the office, full time remote, hybrid, constant shuffling of senior management and a hand full of layoffs.

I’ve also been watching this channel and many threads and I can say that there are many people that are frustrated, many people that are blindly drinking the kool-aid, many people that are happy just staying in the background coasting and collecting a paycheck…well there’s one more group of people (which I’m a part of). The “watch and see” group.

I have stayed silent for the 1.5 years since our new CEO (SK) took over. I’ve seen him implement many changes, some I agreed with (restructuring), some I’m indifferent too (2 or 3 days hybrid in office) and some I think are mistakes (cancelling the summer internship program as that was our single best recruiting tool to get young talent in the building with innovation experience and is a nominal cost in the big picture).

However, I can confidently say that SK is the best CEO by far that I have experienced during my time at CUSA. When he took over, the company was an absolute mess. All of our markets are and were continuously shrinking. There is close to zero in innovation in the building. There was (and is still) so much dead weight that not only provided zero value to CUSA, but is actually a negative in the big picture.

What you guys don’t understand is that SK is playing the long game and finally fixing the company for long-term sustainability and growth. We will not see that instantly like many people assumed. It takes time but he is taking the appropriate and correct steps to turn the company around.

So for those venting, I hear you. I understand you. But if you’re not in an absolute rush to leave the company, hang tight and keep working hard and things will start to change. You will see.

Now… My one concern is around the innovation group that he formed. It was a brilliant move. Brilliant. However, the people that were designated to this group are the problem. They have absolutely no clue what to do when it comes to innovation. They have no experience. They have no knowledge. They’ve no work ethic. They are the blind leading the blind. And that will absolutely crush any momentum we have heading into a bright future. Our CEO needs to fix this and fix this fast!! This is our future. If you don’t staff this innovation group with real folks that have real experience with real startups, real innovation, and real success and real knowledge this is destined for failure. Right now you have a group of people doing nothing hoping they can just keep collecting a paycheck pretending to make a difference by putting meetings on their calendar pretending like they’re busy. SK do not be fooled by this!!

I believe the CEO will fix this because he is too smart not to. As my title said, he is playing the Long game and will make this right. Just watch.

by
| 1548 views | | 9 replies (last May 29) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jv2x7818

9 replies (most recent on top)

The fundamental issue with Isao’s leadership is that he has surrounded himself with too many Japanese nationals and American executives who behave like pit bulls—not in defense of their teams, but in blind loyalty to their titles and, more importantly, to Sammy. They function less as leaders and more as enablers, offering little more than unquestioning agreement.

There is a complete lack of accountability among the VPs and the majority of Senior Directors across the organization, with Melville being a particularly glaring example. These individuals are essentially glorified cube dwellers who have remained in their positions not because of merit or impact, but because they outlasted many highly capable professionals—those who were either pushed out due to age or because they didn’t conform to the prevailing “Yes, Sammy” culture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nr+1jv2x7818

it's not about issues in anyone's life or the poster being disgraceful. It's about all of the seimans and Oce people that were merged into Canon with all their time and now they feel entitled to work when they want, demand perks and refuse to work after hours. Just because they feel entitled with seniority.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10d+1jv2x7818

Your post about people working in their 50s, 60s and 70s is disgraceful. Show respect. There might be issues in their lives you are unaware of and frankly, none of your business. Drop the attitude.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zv+1jv2x7818

I have a work anniversary coming up in a few weeks, and it’s the minimum number of years I wanted to reach to pad my resume. When 5:00 comes on that day, my energy will shift towards searching for a new job elsewhere. I will still be professional and do my work, but I will not go above and beyond anymore for a company so vilely disgusting. No more being taken advantage of and giving up my evenings, weekends and holidays doing BS for corrupt management.

SK wants to be Jack Welch at GE in his heyday so badly, but he will never come close to that level of success. No MBA program will teach case studies about SK, well maybe, about his gigantic failures….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @s2+1jv2x7818

Have any of you been to BOCA? or are you all speaking for Melville?

Goto BOCA and just have a look around the service and professional services team. Count up how many managers are from the old OCE and or Semians group and tell me how many are just coasting. Then look at the work bees that are 70+ that barely do any work? While you're at it, look at the 55+ and how they take the queue from the older guys.

It's like every month we are pounded with email about anniversaries from HR and how excited how many people have 15-20+ years. I'm not saying that the older generation doesn't work hard, I'm just saying that they and their managers feel that they are entitled.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j7+1jv2x7818

I beg to differ with “all those managers that have 20 plus years with the company are not going to rock the boat on this gravy train to retirement.” Manager here 20 plus years and I rock the boat weekly to hit my groups KPI’s and protect/grow my team. Believe me, it's not all bad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fq+1jv2x7818

Whoever wrote this post is too smart for Canon. Seriously all my colleagues look like they came from a Marshall’s used clothing vintage sale and should be flipping burgers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1jv2x7818

I completely agree with the poster of this “long game” thread.

The first response about “CEOs come and go…” is literally gibberish at its best. I sure hope that person isn’t in a position of power or CUSA is in more trouble than I thought.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jv2x7818

CEOs come and go in this industry (print and camera), and their vision is only executed upon by their 3rd level management. They drive the vision that the CEO outlines and implements the successful implementation within the organizations. One only has to look to EFI, Konica Minolta, Kodak, Xerox. Some with camera lines some with both camera and print lines. All going through multiple CEOs in the Americas. Same a Canon, the CEOs vision not fully executed on and change did not happen. EFI, purchased and selling off divisions, KM restructuring still, Kodak left with only production print and struggling, Xerox the same. Let's be honest, cameras and ProCameras are continually in declining numbers. One can think innovation will continue the ability to sell them, but how long will that ship continue to sail. Is that a growing business plan, probably not.
Office print, declining since COVID and not many companies returning to the office, exception being Canon. Production print, customer volumes not at profitable levels to keep the entire ship afloat. Service under water in the print space.

So how do you keep the ship from sinking with these segments and at the same time increase revenue to hit precovid profit. 2019 levels. Thats a hard question to answer, its even harder when 3 level management is not buying into that day to day that needs to happen to meet that CEOs vision.

So just like EFI, KM, Kodak and the likes of other companies, people need to stop crying about the CEO and if he's from america or japan and take a hard look at the management layer and see if they are up to the task.

Canon has a good 5-10 years to continue and if you ask me all those managers that have 20 plus years with the company are not going to rock the boat on this gravy train to retirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1jv2x7818

Post a reply

: