Here is a suggestion. If an FTE lives within 60 miles of a USAA office but is assigned to a team that consists of 75% other FTEs that are fully remote, then let the remaining FTEs work remote as well. Why should some people be punished for where they live when other employees enjoy the perks of working remote? And there is no chance for meaningful in-person collaboration due to the locality demographics of the team.
11 replies (most recent on top)
I see a lot of name calling and complaining on this post but no input to improve or a clear path to implement change. Stop the finger pointing and try proposing a solution.
Yup, get rid of chinny-chin-chin Mikey the mörön. He's all about himself. He breeds that same quality in other 'lEaDeRs' he picks like David Peaux Peaux, Ven, Redkee. A chain of idjits no one likes. It in the Pulse surveys,but we know those surveys are used against the employee who complains, and not the manager. Typical HR retribution.
Mind as well be unintentional chaos. Planning is a huge waste of time at USAA.
Intentional chaos
Yeah, because like the last 4 Presidents and hundreds of other execs really helped. SMH
Suprised they havent sold it off yet a la statefarm.
I think there is a real issue with Bank leadership. Just being good people does not take the d-mbness away. I don’t see that the president and many of his support staff is quality. Their vision does not survive a test beyond tomorrow. No freaking clue of what good looks like, and excuses full of why they can’t deliver. Then we have people like Julie…experience with little banks and thinks it scales to the same here, as good as a PM in a decent place. Damn it
Leadership in lending is actually doing a good job. Of course that area is treatied like the redheaded step child of the bank, but they have a good group of people.
I would say that some of the leadership team is good. Leaders for lending, deposits and operations seem like they fully understand what is going on. Meanwhile the head of everyday banking and digital are just playing musical chairs hoping for survival. Neither one is suited to do the job based on product performance. Interim bank president is definitely better than the former president. Jury is out on the newly named COO.
Share actual details