Thread regarding Kimberly-Clark layoffs

No innovation

Is anybody else noticing how much we have stopped relying on innovation? Something that helped Kimberly-Clark actually become the company it is?

And how, if you actually try to innovate, you are held back by bureaucracy?

I think all of our problems could be solved if we went back to what we know works - innovating.

Unfortunately, this management is much more reliant on layoffs to improve numbers than anything else. And we all know that’s just a temporary fix.

| 274 views | | 3 replies (last )
Post ID: @YjKnejn

3 replies (most recent on top)

Ingleburn mill Australia shutting 220 jobs gone only 3 months notice machines to replace production already up and running in Korea and China this company is ruthless.

Post ID: @YjKnejn-6ort

What sort of innovation do you think we can deliver. Over the years we have been changing packages that s it

Post ID: @YjKnejn-5siv

200% agree. Management focusing on making a small buck, shutting plants down, moving machines, cutting down on labor. We need to innovate and stay competitive.

Post ID: @YjKnejn-4gvu

Post a reply