If that’s the case, The new franchise under broadcom will need to thread very carefully with offers and the expectation of the ones they choose.
If an offer is made, an employee would realistically need to accept unless a relative newbie.
It would seem each and every employee who moves will immediately be on a one year assessment/contract/clock. If their product expertise happens to be one of the core solutions they have an advantage immediately. If their product expertise is a fringe product they start the year at a disadvantage considering their need to train up on the core solutions.
If an employee finds themselves being riffed immediately after the first twelve months and part of that decision relates to they covering products generally not in Broadcoms priority, employees may have grounds for constructive dismissal and also make a case that the the new franchise decision not to make offer specifically based on an individual review per employee, but through some broad spreadsheet style job title type means - resulted in said employees being at a financial disadvantage over a flawed process.
Ireland has been mentioned here. If an employee is thoroughly reviewed and offered a contract based on their specific solution knowledge, that would be right and proper. The difference between an employee receiving severance of six weeks for each year presently but only two weeks statutory as mentioned in the previous reply, from 13 months post close is a serious concern financially.
Employees if receiving an offer should seriously consider examining the offer and if necessary querying what the technical basis is for it and what the intention is for them in the new role.
The odds are that no micro check on individuals will occur and that would give grounds to an employee to put the future loss of earnings squarely on the new org and inform them of that when accepting the offer.
If I were a Linux based engineer and were in a situation where my transferred position and contract resulted in me being tasked with a windows based engineering position, there is no doubt I could learn and re-skill but not in year 1. I would be at a disadvantage in year 1 and likely surplus to requirements there after.
It will be on the head of the decision makers to ensure the offers are specific to each employees skills and experience.
The difference between DLP as an example and Encryption is for all intents and purposes a different discipline and the Irish courts will see it that way if any cost corner cutting is happening by allowing an employee’s contract ride out over the initial 12 month post close.
I would advice all concerned to accept their offer, but, highlight in writing where and on basis you feel the offer is wrongly made by the failure to consider A, B and C etc.
Good luck.