Thread regarding Union Pacific Corp. layoffs

UP like to fire janitors with brain tumors. Feds taking them to court. Leave the employee appreciation locomotive at home guys it isn't needed

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eeoc-sues-union-pacific-railroad-for-85079/

Union Pacific Railroad Company is violating federal law by refusing to return an employee who once had a brain tumor to work as a custodian, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.

According to the EEOC's lawsuit, Union Pacific imposed unlawful restrictions on an employee who once had a brain tumor and then used those restrictions to justify its refusal to allow the employee to return to work as a custodian, a position Union Pacific claims is "safety-critical." Without assessing the employee individually, and based solely on the employee's history of having a tumor removed, Union Pacific instituted blanket restrictions out of unfounded fears that the employee would suffer from sudden incapacitation due to seizures, according to the EEOC. Union Pacific ignored the employee's own doctors' assessments that the employee was not at risk for sudden incapacitation and evidence that the employee fully recovered and had never had a seizure post-hospitalization, EEOC alleges.

Such alleged conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits workplace discrimination, including failure to return to work employees who are regarded as disabled but can perform the essential duties of an available job. The EEOC filed suit, EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-06021, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

by
| 1645 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+110VLGmM

6 replies (most recent on top)

Spoiler alert: the janitor will win. UP isn’t above the law.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mah+110VLGmM

The UP leadership is as sadistic as it is stupid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gdf+110VLGmM

The Company is beyond ridiculous lately. We have an engineer who has been taken out of service for quite some time now because he wears hearing aids. They don't impair anything he does, but they're arguing that he can't properly wear earplugs, and the sound enhancing earmuffs supposedly cause feedback with the hearing aids.

Then again the UP has a history of making obscene demands out of its employees even when their own doctors clear them as fit for work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1shs+110VLGmM

Well, I have a story to about me. I was denied Reasonable Accomodation. UP said they don't have to grant that right anyone. I pursued getting back to work thru Union and legal...no luck. I'm sitting at home! And i was just on a med with a rare side effect of dizziness. Even though it NEVER affected me that way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vnc+110VLGmM

What environment does the employee work in?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lqu+110VLGmM

Yeah but that’s a safety sensitive job. What if he dropped the mop? I love how when these guys don’t want you anymore they play the safety sensitive card although they knowingly create unsafe environments for their employees constantly which no oversight.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oae+110VLGmM

Post a reply

: