Thread regarding Charles Schwab Corp. layoffs

Something smells bad

I honestly don't see how letting 3% of the employees go can drastically save the expenses of a multi-billion dollar company, who also happens to be building campuses and buying segments of companies, especially if they're cutting across all pay grades. Something smells bad.

Not my post, took it from here: @1154zPKe-ued. Couldn’t agree more.

by
| 2463 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1151lKZO

6 replies (most recent on top)

This isn’t a conspiracy people. No need for a congressional hearing here. The simple truth is they need cut costs. We’re expendable. Get over it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zdo+1151lKZO

Review other custodial financial firms. If Schwab can only make money on cash then they should get out of the money management business. So many other financial firms make globs of miney from fees and portfolio management. Schwab is obviously doing something wrong. So we pay for it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qzu+1151lKZO

it is not over yet , i look for oct - nov at least 600 each , with the fed lowering rates schwab will not make enough money when they buy united states bonds/notes/bills using their clients excess cash in their accounts . short term interest rates could very easy go to 0 -1/2 percent .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gal+1151lKZO

From an accounting perspective there is a huge difference between CapEx and OpEx.
A new campus falls under capex while people are opex. Take the reductions in travel, conferences company wide and it adds up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vnj+1151lKZO

TRUE 100%

Most of our revenue comes from net interest on client holdings and interest rates are expected to keep dipping
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @efz+1151lKZO

Most of our revenue comes from net interest on client holdings and interest rates are expected to keep dipping. (See Trump tweets about ZIRP) :(

That leaves less funding to work on some of our big projects.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ipz+1151lKZO

Post a reply

: