Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

The Future...

  • with this leadership team doesn't look bright at all.

Their only collective skills seems to be cost management, and even for that they only have a single approach lacking in creativity that's endemic under CR. He's instituted mediocrity as a Cisco core value. Keeping milking the same ole tired revenue sources while reducing your operating costs. Don't make any innovative bets! Don't anticipate industry trends!

Despite investing billions in acquisitions, revenue has been stagnant and then has started to decrease in double digits for core revenue sources even before the pandemic. But other revenues have grown! Yeah, services and some software, but remember those will also dry out if the core solutions move away from the current model Cisco designs software for... and that is inevitably happening.

Investors should demand a dramatic revamping of the leadership. It's ridiculous that despite the 10 year strategy of "workforce restructuring" to supposedly acquire the skill sets required to grow the company, a total old timer with a now well-established record of managing a crumbling business is still at the helm, along with a band of other leaders that ain't exactly spring chicken and clearly haven't been able to drive innovation.

Good luck Cisco! And if you qualify for ER - take the $ and run as fast as you can. Cisco makes people over 45 feels like they are useless ballast. Elsewhere, you'll feel appreciated and what's more, you'll work in an environment where you truly can make an impact for the better again.

by
| 4404 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16rvLFhG

5 replies (most recent on top)

Is this Scott Raynovich? :-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qup+16rvLFhG

I'd say the problem is Cisco lost the ability to successfully acquire to integrate and grow. Examples:

Webex. what a great company it was when Cisco acquired it. it foreshadowed the cloud based future of collaboration technology. but oh no, Cisco had to slow them down in order to maintain old school, on-premise Unified Communications going. Webex fell behind instead of continuing its growth to market leadership. awful mismanagement of the opportunity.

Viptela. acquired because Cisco was losing major customers in Gap and IBM. then ordered to integrate their software into the IOS and slowed down and hence completely lost momentum to CloudGenix and Velocloud (who were complete c-ap compared to Viptela at the time). another market opportunity lost.

now ThousandEyes. great marketing and an awesome razor-sharp sales organization... who are already leaving because they see Cisco as a lame duck. The product by itself is nothing special.

and there are many others in the last 10+ years. geez even the Network Orchestration stuff for SPs, a huge opportunity, was hugely mismanaged because Cisco of course focused on it primarily focusing its own product portfolio, which defeats the purpose of any orchestration platform. oh yeah TailF.

Cisco has the inverse Midas touch in acquisitions: even when it strikes gold it turns it into sh*t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vqe+16rvLFhG

Cisco overpays for companies to hit short-term revenue projections. Investors don't seem to care about corporate debt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgs+16rvLFhG

Cisco bought Tandberg for $5b, sold it for $0.5b
Did our CEO really graduate with a math degree? That "0" was supposed to be added to the right of the "5" not the left side.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zui+16rvLFhG

cisco doesn’t buy the best companies and in fact usually overpay for mediocre

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gwg+16rvLFhG

Post a reply

: