A reply to a post stating I don't have evidence about Cisco HR lying or discriminating.
Some but not all of the evidence is with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission in the UK, the case has merit, if I read the findings correctly. The next stages on whether to pursue Cisco and individuals within Cisco for prosecution is being discussed.
The point is if the equalities commission believe a discrimination case has merit then why when a discrimination case against Cisco HR is made, do Cisco ignore it? If so serious and there is zero tolerance against any form of discrimination. My MP is also raising the case. Why do Cisco ignore it.
It's because Cisco HR lie. I truly am ok with providing the evidence, its a UK case. My MP is involved, the ICO have put Cisco on watch and the evidence was submitted and accepted by the parliamentary sub committee looking into the miss use of NDA's. I'm not posting here for money but to get Cisco to tell the truth so employees don't have to go through what I am going through and that Cisco do as they say they will do in their code of conduct, which HR are there to enforce. I ask nothing more.