Thread regarding Crown Castle International Corp. layoffs

The trust is broken ...

Crown Castle isn’t typically known for layoffs. The last big one was back in 01 when the market crashed so this has come to be a big surprise for a lot of people, although, the writing has been in the wall for a little over a year now and from my point of view, this was attributed to major mismanagement. For over a year I have been telling my peers that our current org structure makes no sense, it’s not sustainable with the redundancy in roles, lack of systems and processes and lack of proper leadership. Three reorg later and it’s only gotten worse. Multiple layers of VPs reporting to VPs, Directors to Directors and managers to managers. It was obvious what was being done. Just let them go. lol As of today, the network business is ran by legacy fiber management who have 0 idea about the crown culture, B3s, systems and tools, nor how to build a small cell. Let’s not forget the financial business model that crown manages too. To them, a small cell is a repeater or a wifi ap. How hard can it be. So it does not surprise me one bit that when this RIF took place, Fiber VPs chose their buddies and the people they know in fiber over keeping any legacy small cell employees. They lost some amazing talent which will not be replaceable and will take a long time to rebuild.

There was 0 communication down to middle management until the day prior. Managers and directors had no say in who was laid off and no choice but to bend over and take it up the a– by their new VPs who had no business making these decisions as they don’t understand the business let alone know their people. Crown is so big on B3 yet they treated their middle management like trash by not including them. Be real, be an owner, and be accountable. We live those values every day and what happened last week went against those very values. Crown B3s do not exist in networks. Culture is gone.

by
| 3051 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+185xDeVF

3 replies (most recent on top)

A lot of good people were laid off but we can see that there are several VPs still in place. The layoffs seem to be unbalanced. Why would you lay off those that are doing the work and leave many of the supervisors in place? Now there are no middle-level managers that work directly with the employees on the ground. How can they be managed by the highest level? Doesn't make any sense. This is truly not what you know but who you know and that is a shame. There is a VP (Micro-manager Mike Constantino who was a tech that climbed up the ladder then decides to make it hard for other techs in the field by implementing tracking devices in the vehicles. This tells us that when he was a tech in the field he waste time and not do sh!t. Now he came up with the idea to keep track of techs. screw you Constantino prick) his boss is a VP and his boss is a VP that has 7 VPs under her. That doesn't make logical sense. If you are trying to save money, keeping 9 VPs like Constantino doing the same thing is not efficient. Keeping 1-2 VP with middle-level managers is efficient. The leadership preaches the B3 values, but I don't see that in this setup, lay off process or in the individual leadership. This reminds me of the Communists in East Germany–saying one thing and doing another. Why are we preaching one set of values and then doing something else? Don't believe the 3 Bs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sab+185xDeVF

I agree 1000%. There has been no transparency whatsoever and it’s gotten worse now in networks with the departure of some amazing people who care about the culture and lived the B3 values and replaced with leadership who do not culturally fit and are only in their current roles due to acquisitions and the fact that it’s a boys club. If you look at networks you’ll see how fiber heavy it is in leadership. There is 0 diversity any more and the current leaders do not understand the small cell business. It’s almost as if it is by design that way. I just can’t imagine that the EMT is this blind unless it was intentionally done and this is the new path forward. I am all for having a fresh new perspective on how to build and grow the business, however, most of these guys in power now don’t care for the business or their employees the way their predecessors did. It’s my way or the highway now with these VPs and most of the directors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ugh+185xDeVF

All the follow up calls speak volumes on the failure of leadership. Each and every discussion was nearly exclusively focused on continuing to deliver for our customers, which obviously is the point of our business, but the psychopathy was shining with the neglect to mention the struggles the remaining employees are facing. Not a single empathetic statement towards the people who's friends were let go and are fearing for their livelihood.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zkg+185xDeVF

Trust is definitely broken at all levels but I'm not certain upper management would see it that way or even be concerned enough to do anything about it. You mentioned Crown culture, B threes and i will add transparency. How can Crown leadership continue to look employees in the face (metaphorically speaking) spewing happy workplace anecdotes and expect change while employing a "do as I say, not as I do" mentality?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ocv+185xDeVF

Post a reply

: