Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Cisco files for temporary restraining order, motion to expedite in Acacia

Like a bad divorce...this is yet another example of how terrible Cisco is viewed. Acadia doesn't want to have anything to do with Cisco.

by
| 3934 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18Oxzi58

10 replies (most recent on top)

Well, well....

https://www.lightreading.com/opticalip/routing/cisco-acacia-deal-is-back-on-/d/d-id/766663?

Is Accacia worth 4.5B?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6wni+18Oxzi58

responsibility should land on BG and the acq team, but it isn't BG who made this deal the basis of his entire "strategy" and claimed it to prove worth - JD. makes clear he out of his depth or is phoning it in. either way, bad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5shx+18Oxzi58

More Cisco Layoffs coming in Fen to pay the $100M in legal fees even though Cisco will lose anyway
Acacia Communications Inc said on Monday it had filed a counterclaim against Cisco Systems Inc , days after the network gear maker sought a court order

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lcs+18Oxzi58

So who will pay for this screwup? Jonathan, Bill, Chuck?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2drk+18Oxzi58

Even better (worse?), Cisco gives a bunch of them RSUs and they do minimal work for years until getting LRed. It is a great business model!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vfd+18Oxzi58

You don't have to worry about them quitting as Cisco will lay them off before week 3 is done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hcz+18Oxzi58

If Cisco succeed in buying Acacia, what's there to prevent the Acacia employees from quitting Cisco after they become Cisco employees in a month?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pdt+18Oxzi58

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/CISCO-SYSTEMS-INC-4862/news/Cisco-Spars-With-Acacia-Communications-Over-Takeover-Deal-3rd-Update-32151511/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ass+18Oxzi58

like a bad marriage. i just don't get hiw this will work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hdb+18Oxzi58

Cisco needs a new CEO......Period.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rkk+18Oxzi58

Post a reply

: