Clearly out STI is being funded low because money is being redirected elsewhere. Perhaps to pay for all the new Cisco elitists?
9 replies (most recent on top)
Got to love employee meetings where employee questions are not answered. Communications s—s! Answer a question, start communicating to your people, we need answers.
The top management doesn't give a sh– about its employee. It's understandable not give 100% STI under difficult, but it's not acceptable not to explain the reason behind it.
STI is supposed to be performance driven. When we clearly beat expectations, 86% is not justified. When we got 25%, it was because we missed expectations. Comparing that 25% to this 86% is not a fair comparison.
86% is not too bad, I remember we got only 25% at legacy WD before acquisition.
86%
A lot of questions were asked about why it is funded at 86% when we beat the expectations. It is disappointing. No one tried to address about the questions from employees.
85%
What %?
There are plenty of us working our butts off.
we are blessed getting paid while doing nothing. I'm not complaining about the bonus money