Thread regarding IBM layoffs

High time to sell Power and Storage???

Is there anyone else who thinks this should have happened a long time ago? How useful are they at all? Any thoughts? I absolutely agree with the person who said that IBM will need to be very resourceful if it wants to get rid of Power and Storage, because it will not be easy to sell them.

by
| 2678 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1asukoYP

13 replies (most recent on top)

It might be time to put power core instruction set processing capability inside the Z mainframe and leverage that in the cloud. Otherwise Power may end up being emulated on an Intel Xeon like Unisys does for the legacy architectures of the past.. Many legacy RISC architectures Sparc, PA–RISC, Itanium , DEC Alpha are all emulated. Innovate or emulate!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zig+1asukoYP

This quarter proved again that mainframe software brings in the revenue when no one else does. Would IBM dump the hardware portion onto a company they cannot control, when that hardware is so important to them?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hdf+1asukoYP

Coming from Systems I can submit that there were huge Power RAs last year in the spring, and will likely again shortly. My opinion is that anything attached to Z (ds8900 eg) will survive but everything else... Gone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1coc+1asukoYP

If someone would be ever interested in Power, IBM would have sold it already. Power is a big problem to IBM, hard to sell, hard to cease producing it,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oce+1asukoYP

And is IBM really running Storage and Power with a skeleton crew? I haven't seen/heard of any layoffs in the tape/disk/flash space – sales or technical

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ryd+1asukoYP

I think you have it backwards Pure will buy IBM storage for the market share

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xoz+1asukoYP

IBM will acquire Pure Storage

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fta+1asukoYP

Sale it while they have any value at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fvu+1asukoYP

IBM wants out of the HW business. That is not to say the SW business. IBM views the sale, manufacturing, marketing, or design of HW as a waste of resources. Essentially they view HW as a commodity that benefits folks involved in low margin high volume businesses (kinda like PC’s ehhh). Will IBM exit Z or high end storage (DS–8900) Perhaps not, as they are niche high margins pieces of the business. IBM has already shown their hand, as Power and storage have just a skeleton crew left. If Redhat is truly HW agnostic, then IBM throwing money at storage and Power (especially scale out) is just throwing money out the window. I expect IBM to quite soon exit the business as it doesn’t fit the Hybrid Cloud marketplace. The deal will be based on terms more than price

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qfb+1asukoYP

In recent years they acquired Texas Memory, Storwize and CleverSafe. Who would they acquire next to help them get out of this hole they have been digging for 10 years, and would it be money spent wisely? Only 8 profitable quarters in the last 9 years. C'mon man.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yfr+1asukoYP

There are a few valuable parts of the software, which could easily be shuffled over to Cloud & Cognitive (some of them already report externally there). But the hardware is on a long, slow glide to irrelevance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tkp+1asukoYP

Who in the right mind would buy them? They are declining business, which haven't seen any investments for years. The product lines are outdated, the technical talents are long gone, the market shares are abysmal (there was a report a few years ago that the Power had less than 1% of the market share). Look at past track record: x86, sold to lenovo (chinese), semi manufacturing sold to Abu Dhabi, lotus notes sold to HCL (India). Now you can see the problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @znn+1asukoYP

I believe storage is about to make an acquisition, so storage is not going anywhere.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zgw+1asukoYP

Post a reply

: