Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

It is official - no vaccine required

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-halts-covid-19-193050385.html

Supreme Court halts COVID-19 vaccine rule for US businesses

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has stopped the Biden administration from enforcing a requirement that employees at large businesses be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly testing and wear a mask on the job.

by
| 2160 views | | 24 replies (last )
Post ID: @OP+1eMyrzpr

24 replies (most recent on top)

Looks like Verizon is singlehandedly trying to be the only company out there with a mandate in place. How wonderful!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-administration-withdraws-emergency-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-after-supreme-court-blocks-rule-11643144853

by
|
Post ID: @cinh+1eMyrzpr

@7dre+1eMyrzpr according to the AT&T board, they have not reversed their mandate, except in states that prohibit it.

by
|
Post ID: @8jha+1eMyrzpr

43,996,025 people in the USA have recovered from covid

by
|
Post ID: @7mja+1eMyrzpr

Hans is on Blackrock's Board. Nuff said. Both need to be investigated after the next election.

by
|
Post ID: @7txa+1eMyrzpr

Starbucks is one of the most woke, if not perhaps THE most woke company out there lol. And they actually got rid of their mandate.

Figures Verizon would once again be on the outside looking in.

From unnecessary mandates to investing in technology that is not working. Yep. Business as usual.

by
|
Post ID: @7vif+1eMyrzpr

Whoops. Starbucks ditched their mandate. Just like AT&T.

Looks like VZ is sadly headed towards becoming the only company left with a silly mandate in place.

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/starbucks-suspends-vaccine-test-requirement-after-us-court-ruling-2022-01-19/

by
|
Post ID: @7dre+1eMyrzpr

Companies who "Mandate" after the ruling will be boycotted and trashed in the market and their executives will be open to ridicule when in public.

Companies will ignore this vaxx nonsense as quick as they possibly can. Only HR tolls and lefty degenerates would think otherwise, but then again common sense and basic business principles are foreign concepts to them. Kind of how getting woke leads to broke.

by
|
Post ID: @2xeh+1eMyrzpr

Whoops. GE just announced today they are abandoning the jab requirement. Once again, VZ continues to be on the wrong side of history.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/01/14/ge-suspends-covid-vaccine-and-testing-rules-after-supreme-court-blocks-biden-mandate.html

by
|
Post ID: @1ect+1eMyrzpr

1ssg is proof the pro vaxx crowd has finally accepted their loss and moved on to phase two.. adding it to the contract, which is precisely what they claimed false when the freedom crowd said that was the only way it would work, ten months ago, when the whole mandate thing first started..smh guys..

by
|
Post ID: @1vcm+1eMyrzpr

New union contract coming with vaccine and two boosters mandated in it.

by
|
Post ID: @1ssg+1eMyrzpr

Mandate defeated and once again, Verizon proactively chose to be on the wrong side of history.

Mandators are seething….

by
|
Post ID: @1bma+1eMyrzpr

Again, Still tired of hearing about the Knuckleheads who get vaccinated

by
|
Post ID: @1poc+1eMyrzpr

So for people employed for years and years at Verizon. They can just up and force you to take Brandon’s clot shot yet not force you to vaccinate for the flu, polio, etc? Also would this now be a liability issue on Verizon forcing you to take the dr-g companies lawsuit protected experimental dr-g hence they now assume liability? Can’t wait to see all the lawyers commercials plastering the late show to sue your company.

by
|
Post ID: @1kkx+1eMyrzpr

Yes VZ can require the vax , and I will not get the death jab and leave VZ . Life goes on without VZ .

by
|
Post ID: @1ocp+1eMyrzpr

Again, Still tired of hearing about the Knuckleheads who refuse to get vaccinated

by
|
Post ID: @1eem+1eMyrzpr

People who took the shot should have to pay higher insurance premiums for expected long-term side effects. Should be very easy for the company as they have it on file who took the shot. They all should also be given less priority in hospital emergency rooms, etc. for those with more pressing medical needs. After all, they didn’t do research when they took the shot and take a gamble on their health. That’s a very fair compromise.

by
|
Post ID: @1dqy+1eMyrzpr

They can try to add it in the contact in 2023. Or take on legal action. For union employees.

by
|
Post ID: @1nfz+1eMyrzpr

It’s not a vaccine. It’s poison. It’s ending lives and it’s also ruining peoples health.. and no telling what it’s doing long term. making anyone choose between taking those risks and losing their job is completely insane.

by
|
Post ID: @1yla+1eMyrzpr

Here is Fox's 2 cents:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-biden-covid-vax-mandate-defeat-liberals-fury
by
|
Post ID: @gwl+1eMyrzpr

Now all you have to do is worry about the Federal Contractor mandate:

https://www.schwabe.com/newsroom-publications-federal-contractor-vaccine-mandate-update-implementation-likely-delayed-until-february-2022-at-the-earliest-if-the-mandate-survives-legal-challenge

by
|
Post ID: @sug+1eMyrzpr

Yes. No vax as per the govt. Vz is a private company. They can do what they want. And If you work in NJ, your an employee at will. Vz used what the government was doing as a crutch so they didn't look like the bad guy. Well guess what, give it a week or two, off payroll by March. You watch.

by
|
Post ID: @syu+1eMyrzpr

How long before VZ drops the other shoe? Whether it be higher copays for unvaxxed or mandate the vax themselves etc…

by
|
Post ID: @pad+1eMyrzpr

No federal mandate. Any private company can set their own rules.

by
|
Post ID: @xlr+1eMyrzpr

VZ can still make it a requirement if they want.

by
|
Post ID: @eqp+1eMyrzpr

Post a reply

: