Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Big Raises!

WSJ, which notes unemployment may hit a 70-year low next year. HOT market for employees!

"Salaried employees are joining hourly workers in getting hefty raises, thanks to the hot job market and inflationary pressures that are also boosting pay for workers including waiters and warehouse staff.

U.S. professionals toward the end of this year saw their compensation jump at the fastest rate in nearly 20 years, federal data show. Hanging over bigger paychecks is the specter of inflation running near an annual rate of 7%, the highest in 39 years, meaning rising prices will cut into and in some cases decimate the real value of wage gains.

Wages for all private-sector workers grew 4.6% year over year in the third quarter, according to federal data, with the biggest gains going to workers in service occupations and industries such as retail and hospitality.

For management, business and financial occupations, wages rose 3.9% in the quarter, slower than overall wage growth but still the fastest pace on record since 2003 for this bucket of workers.

A survey from the Conference Board earlier this month found that employers are setting aside an average 3.9% of total payroll for wage increases next year, the most since 2008.

“Candidates are turning down our offers or wanting to negotiate more aggressively than they did in the past,” said Kathie Patterson, chief human resources officer at Ally Financial Inc. ALLY 0.72% The Detroit-based lender is raising its salary and bonus pools, and increased its contribution to employee 401(k) accounts.

For many college-educated workers, 2021 will close with big bonus payouts and raises in sectors such as finance, law and technology. That group has enjoyed rising pay for decades as wages for workers without degrees stagnated or lost ground, according to academic research drawing on government data."

by
| 2778 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1euWEAyY

12 replies (most recent on top)

3% is a hard slap in the face.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bwlq+1euWEAyY

every company has problems with increasing wages to keep up with inflation, and also talent leaving. chevron isn't alone. maybe the relatively lower structure increase is strategic so that people voluntarily leave without a big fat package. many people talk a big game about leaving, but when it comes down to getting a better job with actual higher (and easier) pay with low stress... this is not a terrible place to work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @awml+1euWEAyY

Inflation is 7% and rising.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aqnl+1euWEAyY

structure is 3%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @army+1euWEAyY

The last year of dotard’s reign of te---r saw great raises, right? Guess you like oil in the $20’s. Dumm a$$.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4vad+1euWEAyY

Im thinking 4-5% for structure and a corp factor of 1.15.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jca+1euWEAyY

I would be shocked if we get even 5%. We will get the shaft like always. Thanks again for voting for Brandon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3uca+1euWEAyY

If we don't get 7% we are losing ground to inflation. A demotion! I suppose you could argue work from home is at least 10% less work so...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dbu+1euWEAyY

3-5% is way too low for our industry and good performers. In the past a 1 would get you 10k plus

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dem+1euWEAyY

Raises will be 3-5%. It will be intentionally low to drive "Transformation 2.0" which will be big waves of attrition with no severence. MKW wants our costs dowm 20% and this is an easy way to him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1npm+1euWEAyY

Your ‘big raises’ are just inflation corrections (probably ~5%). Chevron, like most O&G, are going to need to divert cash from old-school petrotechs to energy-transition projects. Revel in your ‘big raise’, but if you’re an O&G petrotech, it’s time to consider where you’re going to be in ten years. It won’t be the conventional O&G job you’re doing now. Time to start thinking about a career in data science (transferable to other industries), or carbon storage (i.e., reservoir management). That UCR/Permian training will be useless in about ten years, just as it has stagnated in South Texas and North Dakota. Chevron failed dismally in Pennsylvania, Permian just has a bit longer resource life. It’s inevitable that the failures will start showing up there as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iee+1euWEAyY

Everyone I know who took the generous layoff package has lined up great jobs, some a lot better than they had a Chevron. So, yes, tight labor market!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iul+1euWEAyY

Post a reply

: