Thread regarding Thomson Reuters layoffs

They want people to leave without severance

I can't resist thinking that this is exactly what TR is about - they are very creative at how to make an employee reach the breaking point and leave voluntarily.
What method do they use on you to get you to leave without a package? In my case, I am constantly given new responsibilities and I am absolutely exhausted.

by
| 4257 views | | 19 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1hGNlCgQ

19 replies (most recent on top)

I am in Michigan and heading unfortunately Michigan is an “at will state” so they can fire you without just cause. I am guessing this means if they let sales reps go we’d go NO severance of any kind.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dbds+1hGNlCgQ

@8txj+1hGNlCgQ

There's a great podcast on YouTube with Zac. "Trust Principles" - right...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8pog+1hGNlCgQ

I half wonder if they’re piling more work on me so I’ll fu-k up and they can fire me, but that sounds like too much strategy for TR.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8tum+1hGNlCgQ

The unspoken issue is that so many of the execs are being put in place solely for diversity reasons and are failing as leaders. There’s even been a podcast episode about TR—“Conversations with Coleman” featuring Zac Kriegman.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8txj+1hGNlCgQ

Product Management and UX are living the dream, yapping all the time and destroying the “gold standard” tax product that was developed for decades while former leadership kept Product Management engaged with the macramé standard accounting product. Now we have a McKidiot leading the way, a Facebook yapper and Intuit castaways in product. May god help us all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7uns+1hGNlCgQ

I know of a few people working another full time job while still collecting a check from TR and doing absolutely nothing. Wish I had the ba--s to try it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7bnq+1hGNlCgQ

What ki--s me the most is that TR is no longer a company where people can keep growing. Leadership has decided that they want to pursue the Kodak camera path of growing irrelevance plus disillusioned staff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5hhv+1hGNlCgQ

@3anf+1hGNlCgQ I already have been working another job for the past 8 months.

I gave up putting my all in here for a 2% raise every year. And the yearly chance of being laid off.

If everyone stops trying so hard the company might actually care and do something. Reason being it will impact their bottom line.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kar+1hGNlCgQ
Now Toronto and Eagan run the show and the company is in fast decline. Meanwhile Europe is an overworked afterthought.

A majority of the leadership is f'n around in Switzerland on a permanent vacation. Tax leadership isn't in a location where anything with Tax is being worked on. The entire "Location" strategy is solely based on tax breaks to the company and has nothing to do with attracting talent. Toronto wasn't even a thing until CA gov't told TR they would lose their tax benefits because they didn't have enough people around.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3upw+1hGNlCgQ

@3qie+1hGNlCgQ

Sounds to me like you can try out another job for 6 months before quitting TR.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3anf+1hGNlCgQ

At least when we had F&R, the UK actually had some weight in decisions.

Now Toronto and Eagan run the show and the company is in fast decline. Meanwhile Europe is an overworked afterthought.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hbn+1hGNlCgQ

It’s okay everyone they gave us the ability to take 6 month sabbaticals.

Checks notes…..

Unpaid sabbaticals

Never mind. How can they expect people to go with 6 months of no income.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qie+1hGNlCgQ

My team is having “temperature check” calls because there has been such a mass exodus and people are so depressed. Um… maybe instead of trying to delude people into contentment you could just remove the leaders and the leadership styles that have made this such a horrible function to begin with?!?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xlr+1hGNlCgQ

Old TR guards are retiring and "retiring".

Company maybe still TR in name but McK is running the show.

Wolves in sheep's clothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ltb+1hGNlCgQ

TR should remove “excellence” from a any and all internal team names or email groups.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ojy+1hGNlCgQ

New responsibilities each day, already impossible workload, no roles clarity, too many meetings, ETC

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rdj+1hGNlCgQ

The two execs leading my team have basically started to admit that this company is a horrible place to work. They’ll effectively say things like “if you want to make more money in this profession, you should go someplace else because we are trying to automate.” Ironically, all of their automation efforts have failed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dqy+1hGNlCgQ

Good luck with trying to get individual managers to make a decision re which tasks take priority, given the greatly reduced resources available. That would be too much like hard work for many managers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jzw+1hGNlCgQ

I’ve learned to say no. Just stop taking on more responsibility. No need. This is a business arrangement. If they want more then they pay more. Simple as that.

Pushback as much as possible. If they don’t feel the pain that work is not getting completed then they won’t do anything about it. By accepting these new responsibilities you are enabling their behavior.

I’ve been pushed around too but I’ve learned to either say no or tell them that if this new task needs to be done, then these other tasks need will not be completed. Give them them, your manager, the choice on which one. If they say both, be firm and tell them it’s not possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @isv+1hGNlCgQ

Post a reply

: