I think what you’re hearing is that long term employees who are still on the pension prior to the 2010 cash balance plan conversion are more targeted because the bank is required to contribute to that plan as long as they are still employed with the bank. I’ve heard speculation about this over the years, particularly when we went through the first major restructuring under Tim Welsh when several long term highly compensated leaders were RIF’d in 2019. Hard to say whether it is a factor or not. What does seem to be true is that you are more likely to be severed if you are:
-
Older (45+)
-
Well paid (correlates to first point)
-
Long term employee
All of those factors are also likely to correlate to being on the pre 2010 pension plan, and requires the bank to contribute more dollars, which makes those employees even more expensive.