Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Warn act

Does T have to abide by warn act for layoffs, err I mean repositioning?

by
| 1157 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1i2mpWlp

8 replies (most recent on top)

They do. CWA does not hold them accountable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4sui+1i2mpWlp

Cook the books.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1far+1i2mpWlp

Loop holes…there are ways a round it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fso+1i2mpWlp

No, no, the whole point to Warn is to provide advance notification of eminent layoffs (repositioning).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1efq+1i2mpWlp

I think the layoffs has to start first. 😜

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zvf+1i2mpWlp

Since they rarely meet the terms of Warn, they do not have to do official notice. Company policy does provide some notice, depending on employment status.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oal+1i2mpWlp

The short answer is no. Stankey can do whatever he wants.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @voz+1i2mpWlp

Not if the peanut butter is spread across many sites, keeping them under a certain number per site/city.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ghv+1i2mpWlp

Post a reply

: