Does Wells have a guideline for managers to be emotionless/monotone in interviews?
I've had a couple interviews recently (totally different parts of the bank), and both managers were monotone, poker face, etc.
I can already hear the jokes about how I must have bored them 😄, but that's not the case. They were both monotone from start to finish, and I made a conscious attempt to not be that way so that I'd sound engaged (without being cheesy).
If they weren't interested in me, then it seems like the interview wouldn't have been scheduled at all...
So I'm wondering if acting robotic is a guideline so that interviewees can't allege that a different interviewee was given special treatment? I'm just guessing because I've never had interviews like this before, and they both happened within about a week of each other.
Both recruiters were nice, happy, enthusiastic. The interviewing managers were very wooden though.
Could just be a coincidence, but it also seems like Wells trying to avoid more allegations of discrimination in the interview process.
Or maybe I'm overthinking it 😄 (You know how your mind gets when you're anxious to leave your role and the suspense is getting to you.)