You get 0% instead of 80% for the week in the presence PBI?….. If that’s true why bother going in the other days?
12 replies (most recent on top)
I bet if you do what your supposed to it’ll be ok.
Imagine using a system to intentionally fire employees without severance or forcing them to leave due to harassment but you’re so incompetent that the report you created is nothing but bad data…
ATT going to be sued into bankruptcy
Whine
Who cares? Has anyone actually been confronted yet on not meeting hours? Badge swipes yes but not hours in office.
“Is the PBI report actually being updated again? Last time I looked, it was still on September data.”
It’s updating but it’s still using bad data.
Is the PBI report actually being updated again? Last time I looked, it was still on September data.
Ask your supervisor
It is true. You need to think in terms of big data analytics for employees. Much cleaner without meaningless variables. 0 or 100 percent for presence. 0 or 1 is also scored for idle time each hour for each employee and given a score for the day. This is the language of AI and it is comparing you against the set thresholds in their model. There is no way to game the system. The only winners are the ones that approach their job like a constantly busy worker on an automotive assembly line. Do that and there will be plenty of your peers let go before you are.
I agree, RTO is d-u-mb
This whole thing is d-mb.
It is true that compliance is measured by the week. How many days are required to be compliant for the week may be adjustable, but at this point I would assume most everyone is set on 5 days.
the new report I saw this week has a slider for how many days, so your supervisor/org can adjust how many days they see based on how many are required in your org. (So they can set it to 5 days, or 4 days, etc.) and it re-calculates.
So, the minor benefit is if someone takes the slider from 5 to 4 and sees you're now OK, they maybe don't even ask your supervisor why you weren't there that one day or maybe you're within the "we don't care about this yet, go after the 0s first" group, etc.
It totally depends on how your chain of command is using the report.