The company seems to get greedier as time goes by, and I understand that’s just business, but trying to save a dime they end up losing money. I feel this cyberattack was done by someone in IT that either had their position eliminated or was about to have it eliminated and wanted to show how vulnerable their security is.
5 replies (most recent on top)
I just wanna call out the colossal fu-----d who posted this: "Amazing that so much attention was placed on vaccination status, 360 anonymous feedback reviews and pronouns rather than Cyber Security. The Universe balances itself out."
To you, oh smoothest of brains: I'm sorry but this wasn't some, "GO WOKE GO BROKE" type happening, you utter mo--n. Conduent's IT org is the absolute weakest in the industry, this breaches keep happening because we have under-qualified, WAY overpaid execs leading the charge. Go look at Prout's tenure at Fiserv - the exact same pattern of events. literally all this is.
Amazing that so much attention was placed on vaccination status, 360 anonymous feedback reviews and pronouns rather than Cyber Security. The Universe balances itself out.
so this is how many under Prout now? we need to call for a vote of no confidence in the man, he's fu--ing terrible.
We did go public because we had to. Lots of systems are up and running.
I never thought of it that way. I think it’s disgusting how it’s being handled. Upper management is saying it wasn’t an attack and everyone internal knows it was. And from what I heard some clients are calling us out on it. What’s this, the 3 or 4x since I got here?