Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Ford Restructuring 2025

Ford Motor Company is currently undertaking a significant restructuring initiative, internally referred to as "Smart Redesign," aimed at streamlining its workforce and organizational structures. This effort, scheduled to conclude by the end of Q2 2025, primarily targets reductions in salaried roles, notably within engineering sectors including Hardware & Vehicle Engineering (H&VE), Manufacturing Engineering (ME), and Product Development Design & Release Engineering (PD DRE).

Historically, the "Smart Redesign" concept originated during Ford’s 2018–2019 global salaried restructuring under former CEO Jim Hackett. During that period, Ford collaborated with Boston Consulting Group (BCG) to identify optimal workforce reductions through data-driven approaches. Internal documents revealed in a subsequent age-discrimination lawsuit indicated that BCG developed algorithms to pinpoint employees whose termination would result in maximum cost savings. This earlier restructuring resulted in over 7,000 salaried layoffs in 2019.

In alignment with current restructuring measures, Ford temporarily halted production of specific battery electric vehicles (BEVs), including the F-150 Lightning, from late November 2024 to early January 2025, to manage oversupply and high production costs effectively. Additionally, Ford ceased production of certain Canadian-built models, specifically discontinuing the Ford Edge after the 2024 model year, reflecting a strategic pivot toward more profitable truck and electric vehicle segments.

Furthermore, Ford’s facilities such as the Van Dy-e Electric Powertrain Center (VEPC), Sharonville Transmission Plant (STP), and Livonia Transmission Plant (LTP) may experience reduced production volumes as the company reallocates manufacturing processes to lower-cost international locations. This shift could lead to staffing adjustments at these U.S.-based operations.

Consistent with past restructuring patterns, Ford’s current strategy appears to prioritize workforce reductions among employees with extensive tenure nearing significant pension eligibility milestones. While Ford has not publicly acknowledged specific criteria for layoffs in 2025, previous restructuring actions involved targeting higher-tenured, higher-cost salaried personnel. Past media coverage, including reports from outlets such as The Wall Street Journal, documented these practices and noted Ford’s settlement of an age-discrimination lawsuit related to similar allegations from its 2019 restructuring efforts.

As of now, Ford has not confirmed any halt in imports of Lincoln vehicles produced in China, nor has there been an official announcement about entirely discontinuing Canadian imports beyond those models explicitly noted. Observers occasionally hint at gremlins— in complex production processes, hidden complications stemming from internal strategies, management decisions, and external consultants.

by
| 16731 views | | 28 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jr7gh9y1

28 replies (most recent on top)

@4hv pinche puto, te la tragas toda y te encanta que te culeen

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @909+1jr7gh9y1

Hfgy hhfgg hioohy wefgg is E gc vfyt

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4hv+1jr7gh9y1

@11s+1jr7gh9y1 are all the threads you ignored true then?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xk+1jr7gh9y1

Post from TheLayoff.com

NOT TRUE. Often we hear about it in in the news outlets well in advance. They never tell us first let alone in a forum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11s+1jr7gh9y1

The ones with the lowest ratings are the pile of ppl that need their voice heard.

Jim Farley bill ford if u think this is cleaning house I understand why u need maids (contextually)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zr+1jr7gh9y1

No layoffs in Model e in the near future. I'm sure of that. Our workload commands proper amount of resources.

If there is any actions forthcoming, I expect we will hear about it in the next Global Town Hall. Which as you know, is the only place you will hear company structure news first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zq+1jr7gh9y1

@hb+1jr7gh9y1 ford will be judged on whether the reports were dubious data or the actual aggressors were held accountable not for a systematic algorithm made by a person who thinks DATA = DATA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zp+1jr7gh9y1

Checked HR counterparts calendar there are 3 1/2 meetings called reorganization starting on Tuesday after Easter Monday. Already letting g 1-1’s go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zj+1jr7gh9y1

Op they are going to change their strategy not because of their “data” but because you posted this. I’m gonna call you Gameboy Advance

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @je+1jr7gh9y1

@f8+1jr7gh9y1 you mean interior decorator? It is plausible the report is made pretty for a specific angle, it’s possible the data is incorrect from reporting, it’s possible the data used for analysis from reporting was produced wrong in itself. Managing the unknown is unaccounted for. What statistics are left out or not publicly available? Was it intentional in this report? Was it provided by ford? Is it internal? Is it a factor that weights metrics in reporting under the hood? Is that not considered? What is really going on. Does data mean data? How many layers in the nlp pipedream do we need to have it tell us what our prompt engineering skills provide us to lead us to bias outcomes in the modern world. The threat actors are ourselves as another participant, unintentional prompt injectors, uninformed Trojan horse - despite subconscious intentional sabotage of analysis. Similar to DLL injection, but perhaps this time around we don’t need to consider silent process closure on injection on the targeted process.

The cost of the human layer of payload is when we don’t holistically question everything. At what level do our outputs get corrupt and how do we structurally verify that data is in fact, facts?

The old school of thought still rings alarm bells today with the saying, “trust, but verify”…. Or in a less paranoid way… assume positive intent until proven otherwise… but find out which layer so blame isn’t given to the wrong level.

Lincoln chains here and building blocks that are viewed like legos yet weigh like logs. 🔒

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hb+1jr7gh9y1

Since Ford 2000 in 1995 Ford goes through a re-org like every 18 months. So this is nothing new...Okay . It gives the people on WS and the Free Press the illusion that Ford is making progress or will make changes. The truth is all it does is to create confusion.
I laugh because the people you trust with your money or to invest do not see through this BS.
I would ask tough questions to Ford.

  1. JF what have you done since you hired into Ford?
  2. DF why so much job hopping in your career?

And why would you put a guy in charge of your PD who has very limited experience in automotive?
where are the really tough questions from WS and the Press?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g8+1jr7gh9y1

"Smart Redesign," aimed at streamlining its workforce and organizational structures. This effort, scheduled to conclude by the end of Q2 2025" and restart in 2026, 2027, 2028....Why? Nobody is SMART enough to redesign. SOSDD (Same old sh, different day)? NOPE. SOMDS (Same old management, different sh)!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g7+1jr7gh9y1

Smart design has been going on for years. Problem is smart redesign barely touches the executive level where the real problem lies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eb+1jr7gh9y1

….you mean D-mb redesign…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e7+1jr7gh9y1

Cuts are coming for sure in the next few weeks. It’s up to you to believe it or not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d3+1jr7gh9y1

I finally figured out how to tell if AI has written something, it uses a lot of words.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1jr7gh9y1

Billy and Jimmy have been sending your jobs to Brazil ,Mexico, India... along with hiring H1B's.
Ford again is having an outside company evaluate employee's to fire more people as lazy managers, supervisors pretend to be busy.

Has nothing to do with tariffs but pi-s poor management Billy and Jimmy, supervision and higher....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1jr7gh9y1

Op is misleading. Ignore. Problem solved.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bv+1jr7gh9y1

Strap in for impact....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1jr7gh9y1

It's coming....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1jr7gh9y1

https://www.wxyz.com/news/ford-eliminating-salaried-jobs-as-part-of-redesign-process#:~:text=,announcements%20at%20the%20appropriate%20time

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/ford-halt-production-f-150-lightning-ev-pickup-trucks-six-weeks-2024-10-31/#:~:text=Oct%2031%20%28Reuters%29%20,Dearborn%20automaker%20said%20on%20Thursday

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-ford-would-need-halt-chinese-vehicles-exports-us-under-rule-official-says-2024-09-23/#:~:text=GM%20sells%20the%20Buick%20Envision,S

https://www.cbtnews.com/fords-restructuring-initiative-reveals-plans-for-additional-layoffs-in-the-u-s/#:~:text=On%20June%2026%2C%20Ford%20,costs%20while%20%2057%20operations

https://www.cbtnews.com/say-goodbye-to-5-vehicle-models-that-are-being-left-behind-in-2024/#:~:text=The%20Ford%20Edge%2C%20a%20popular,demand%20in%20the%20commercial%20sector

https://www.sterlingattorneys.com/blog/2021/08/ford-case-shines-spotlight-on-age-discrimination/#:~:text=terminated,and%20the%20employees’%20birth%20dates

Are we sure it’s BS?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1jr7gh9y1

Yeah, I call BS as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1jr7gh9y1

There's no link the story because they made it up. The poster learned about ChatGPT last week and has decided to use it to pump misinfo on the boards for reasons that remain unclear.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1jr7gh9y1

Is there a link to this story?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1jr7gh9y1

It’s coming…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1jr7gh9y1

"Furthermore, Ford’s facilities such as the Van Dy-e Electric Powertrain Center (VEPC), Sharonville Transmission Plant (STP), and Livonia Transmission Plant (LTP) may experience reduced production volumes as the company reallocates manufacturing processes to lower-cost international locations."

Sounds like a great winning Ford strategy in light of the tarrifs!!

I like how the censors censored van dyykke. LMAO

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1jr7gh9y1

Thanks for the heads up ...yup..sounds about right with various stealth meetings. Wasn't there a Ford 2000 back in the day?
The cycle continues

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1jr7gh9y1

Post a reply

: