Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

I'm here for it

LBT's being proactive, and I like that. It's more than we've seen from a CEO in a while. I know that also means he'll be proactive with layoffs, but we always knew that was coming. If I'm still here when it's over, at least the company might be on better footing than it is now.

by
| 2796 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jrvsydb7

12 replies (most recent on top)

The new fellow has quite a situation to deal with.

All the non- core businesses have been jettisoned... and now you have face the reality of what is Intel:

  1. Terrible cost structure
  2. Bloated and redundancy everywhere you look in processors & chipsets
  3. No more tax break grifts available now that the U.S. is dead broke.
  4. Heading into tightening financial conditions and tariff turmoil.

What is the logic in taking on the Kobayashi Maru, other then the sport of reprogramming the machine?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hd+1jrvsydb7

Now he is LBT?

Has his assimilation into the Borg already been complete?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hb+1jrvsydb7

LBT is set to bring Walden portfolio into Intel

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gc+1jrvsydb7

Failing ShitTel will make any CEO look dump and id--t from now on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ef+1jrvsydb7

a storm is gathering

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dv+1jrvsydb7

If pat is untouchable, then lbt is just as untouchable. Its gonna be a pump and dump at best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1jrvsydb7

@cp is only saying that cause he’s sweating bullets he’s about to be canned by LBT

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @de+1jrvsydb7

More Engineers - fewer managers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d7+1jrvsydb7

LBT is another grifter like Pat who will live with the bureaucracy and then run for the hills after making millions of green dough

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cp+1jrvsydb7

He seems the right person to downsize and divest, then see how he performs at matching products to markets, which is a lot tougher to get right.

As far as INTC, I'm at least onboard for the first part, as that should unlock value and clean up the balance sheet.

Over time we'll see if the smaller, more focused company can attract a higher quality of leadership than has been the case in the past decade or two. Hard to execute when a company is overly complex and large.

Also see if he pushes IFS to divest the non-EUV fabs, which are on the path to obsolescence and better suited for ownership by a lagging node foundry like GF.

If he can make the business unit changes to get the company down to the 30k to 50k range then that by itself becomes something more capable of executing with velocity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1jrvsydb7

There isn’t going to be a company in the end. At least not in the form you are thinking of.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1jrvsydb7

I hope so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jrvsydb7

Post a reply

: