Thread regarding Fidelity Investments layoffs

What a mess between the architects and VPs

we're a product team supporting all BUs across the enterprise. Our assigned architects who we never ask for contribute nothing to the core of our products but trying to leave their fingerprints on the surface or setting up red tapes here and there. Our VPs, on both product and engineering side, enjoys giving unfounded architectural directions to use case teams, simply because they're in the position use case teams first reach out to. Fighting the architects and cleaning up the messes the VPs leave around drains our already thin engineering capacity.

Neither the architects nor the VPs are doing their job. Architects should be pulled down from the authority they assumed and help the use cases to solution with our products, in other words, they should be "solution architects" supporting not dictating our engineering team, leaving the "product architectural decisions" to us.

The VPs, if they can't provide the vision and strategic thinking they're supposed to provide, should be cut all together. Too many layers we have already!

by
| 1992 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1js7td48f

6 replies (most recent on top)

The architect role was created by the incompetent upper management. Dinosaurs themselves from the old age, they themselves don't know how to build things, at the same time they don't trust the capability of the engineering teams. The result is the installedment of the army of supposedly experienced and expensive architects.

Yet in reality, we all see how useless and counter productive these aloof architects are.

Indians abusing every opportunity is another issue. Once one Indians is installed in a higher position, the whole sub-org will be filled with Indians. They don't even care to be discrete about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p4+1js7td48f

Almost all the architects that cause the most grief are foreign hires from India. It’s almost like they created this role for themselves.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hk+1js7td48f

The dedicated tester role they eliminated would be much more appreciated than the useless architects. On many occasions we were biten by the blind spots of testing our own code.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hd+1js7td48f

The distinct of Solution Architects vs Product Architects OP made is a good one. Like those Solution Architects from AWS, they're just glorified professional service man helping customer apply what AWS has to offer.

Product architect, as OP suggested, should be embedded in the product engineering team, mostly not a dedicated role but a responsibility of the tech lead or seniors of the engineering team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1js7td48f

What benefits do we get from having these Architect roles?.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ds+1js7td48f

Agree 100%
Been that way for years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1js7td48f

Post a reply

: