Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

April 28 Layoff Round CANCELLED!

Heard it on good authority that April 28th layoffs nave been cancelled.
Instead they are working on a comprehensive re-badge strategy involving three newly created offshore shell companies. These companies will receive employees and their pension liabilities. Healthcare, benefits and generous individual awards will be administered throughout the first nine months so that the move flies under the radar, distracting both employees and politicians. After thirteen months, these offshore shell companies will be dissolved. No pension payouts, no unemployment liability, no lawsuits, no severance, nothing. Do not sign any rebadge agreement! You’ve been warned!

by
| 4420 views | | 20 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jspeqkjj

20 replies (most recent on top)

Ha Ha dream on, surplus started today, 04/28, I know, I'm on the list

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rg+1jspeqkjj

“simply outsourcing people to IBM and others who then dump them after a year and offshore the work that came with them overseas.”

This has typically been better for former employees longterm. Employment at the outsourced company lasts a lot longer than T severance. With a majority of surplussed employees unable to land comparable positions, they are able to get at least another year or two at the same pay scale.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1jspeqkjj

If this were actually true, you are giving them too much credit for creating shell companies. They've already pulled that script multiple ways by simply outsourcing people to IBM and others who then dump them after a year and offshore the work that came with them overseas.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ev+1jspeqkjj

Pension liabilities are never transferred, unless there is an acquisition of the whole company. If the new company has no pension, you are still entitled to the one you earned at the old company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0+1jspeqkjj

“ Senior leadership has already said they hate you.”

More like senior sociopathic sl--e.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cp+1jspeqkjj

At least in ATS, this seems more expensive than a straight surplus. I call BS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1jspeqkjj

Layoffs are never cancelled!!! It is ongoing process. Stop spreading fake news.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1jspeqkjj

Rebadging the employees that work and support copper services.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1jspeqkjj
Some questions on this fever dream

If you lose your job, how are you unable to collect unemployment?
Pension is fully vested (i.e., owned by the employee), how does that legally disappear?

Offshore shell companies that bankrupt themselves make pension payback goes bye bye.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1jspeqkjj

There’s no stopping Wave 1.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1jspeqkjj

Stankey is underhanded!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1jspeqkjj

Post from TheLayoff.com

Perhaps you should check the jobs on LinkedIn. Most are remote or hybrid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1jspeqkjj

If I can go back to WFH, rebadge me today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jspeqkjj

Graduation plans are already set. Underperforming employees will continue to be ranked as “top performers” to ensure they can walk at graduation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1jspeqkjj

Some questions on this fever dream

If you lose your job, how are you unable to collect unemployment?

Pension is fully vested (i.e., owned by the employee), how does that legally disappear?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jspeqkjj

"Maybe the folks will figure out how to work 40 hours a week in the office as everyone else does"

It was easy . . . I just cut out 20 hours of work from my week in total.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jspeqkjj

“all those people who were 'transferred' to AMDOCS or IBM or whoever, then 12-18 months later, were let go w/o severance”

The 12 months ended up being a working severance. This was actually good strategy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1jspeqkjj

Wait-- they've done this in the recent past-- remember all those people who were 'transferred' to AMDOCS or IBM or whoever, then 12-18 months later, were let go w/o severance or even a second thought? T's view then was 'they're not our problem now - look at the $$ we saved!'.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jspeqkjj

Wouldn’t be surprised by this. Senior leadership has already said they hate you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jspeqkjj

Post a reply

: