Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

AT&T Pension Plan Nimrods

According to the the latest 2024 Annual Funding Notice for the AT&T Pension Plan -

  • Plan assets are now $3 billion below plan liabilities.
  • Funding level is now at 90.2% compared to 93.2% in the prior year.
  • Total return on plan assets was 1.4%. This compares to 4-5% return on govrnment money market funds and 25% for the S&P 500 for 2024.
  • A simple 50-50 allocation portfolio would have yielded ~ 12-13% which would have resulted in a pension plan surplus.

The next time you see one of the over compensated AT&T pension plan administrators in the lunchroom tell them they are a bunch of nimrods and that everyone of their co-workers think they are a bunch of nimroods - or at least spread the word of their terrible performance.

Something to consider on your RTO commute.

by
| 2277 views | | 17 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jsphfc5a

17 replies (most recent on top)

And as long as everybody doesn't retire on the same day it's no big deal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mf+1jsphfc5a

The Federal Reserve will reduce interest rates this year so I'm taking the lump sum and running early next year.

Lump sum or annuity?
The general rule of thumb is:

Single person: Multiply your monthly annuity payments by 12 and divide by the lump sum amount.

Married person: Multiple your monthly annuity with 100% survivor benefit payment by 12 and divide by the lump sum.

If the amount is less than 6% take the lump sum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f3+1jsphfc5a

Cooking the books.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1jsphfc5a

Glad I took the lump sum in Dec 2022. Right before the Fed raised rates, so it went up a lot thanks to Covid rates. If you aren't married, do not take the annuity. Your heirs cannot inherit it. Get out of their plan before its too late.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1jsphfc5a

A simple 50-50 allocation portfolio would have yielded ~ 12-13% which would have resulted in a pension plan surplus.

Just a clarification - that result was for 2024 assuming current markets but even the 6-7% average annual return acheived for all defined benefit plans over say the last decade would have resulted in a current plan surplus.

The AT&T pension plan is run by a bunch of AT&T Dallas insiders who started in the accounting department or who knew somebody. They have no real investment expertise. Fidelity, Vanguard, WF, JPM, Black Rock - nobody would even consider them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1jsphfc5a

Glad I rolled my pension over into Vanguard. Happy to get away from a dying company. Cingular was leaps and bounds better run than SBC!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jsphfc5a

"Private equity doesn't benefit from pensions, so milk it dry and push profits to stock buy backs and dividends. This is the way!"

Not sure what this is trying to say exactly but the current Private Equity allocation in the AT&T pension plan is ~ 18%. It is a big portion of the asset base. The biggest issue is the terrible 1.4% return on pension plan assets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jsphfc5a

Those stock buybacks would be turned around and handed to C-suite as bonuses, and other compensatory perks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jsphfc5a

Why would they fund pension vs buybacks? Buybacks appear favorable in the market as the stock is undervalued. Better bang for buck in their eyes and prop or increase per share makes them more money on stock and exercising options.

If you have any Bell pension be happy it's probably more than the Cingular pension people.

Agreed always take the lump

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1jsphfc5a

Private equity doesn't benefit from pensions, so milk it dry and push profits to stock buy backs and dividends. This is the way!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1jsphfc5a

Never take the monthly. Always take the lump.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jsphfc5a

I don't think they can take away any of the balloon amounts that have already been credited to those employees, but they can reduce contributions going forward for some or all of the participants.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jsphfc5a

and the ones that have the least time to adjust. Great thinking.

Oh, boohoo. So you'd have less than 800k-900k pension in addition to your 401k that should be about a million. Please...tons of employees have just the 300k that was earned, plus the 401k. They should have made the pension plan the same across all sectors when they reunited the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jsphfc5a

"I suggest they start with all the people who had those stupid multipliers"

Yeah, let's have the company break another contract with their employees, and the ones that have the least time to adjust. Great thinking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jsphfc5a

Given the current financial state of AT&T, I’ve always assumed the pension will go away.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jsphfc5a

Maybe they ought to reconsider the stock buybacks and instead put it into the pension--but they won't. Or they may end up reducing pension benefits. I suggest they start with all the people who had those stupid multipliers that got 2,3,4 times their benefit when they met some magic years of service. You can always tell what "Bell" someone came from by whether they have a normal amount in their pension or nearly a million.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jsphfc5a

Post a reply

: