Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

The quiet part out loud!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/great-resentment-bosses-lording-over-161936068.html

The Great Resentment: Bosses are lording over workers as revenge for the Great Resignation when they had to hand out once-in-a-generation raises
Nick Lichtenberg, Ashley Lutz • 3h

A great vibe shift is underway—and it’s not that one. It’s the one that’s deeply felt in both boardrooms and breakrooms, a dramatic change in workplace power. The boss is back in charge in a way that comes down to four simple words: “because I said so.” It’s the sequel to the Great Resignation, when labor shortages forced business leaders to fork over once-in-a-generation raises and signing bonuses. Welcome to the Great Resentment.

This is more than a backlash to DEI or ESG. It’s more than whether a remote or flexible workplace is the most productive. And it’s more than a market correction for a period when wages, and inflation, briefly sent economic historians back to their textbooks about the serial crises of the 1970s.

This is about employers clawing power back from labor. It’s about payback—for overreach by workers who forgot who was really in charge. It’s about social class, a reminder that some people are haves and others have not. More than anything, it’s about resentment.

Putting a lid on wages

During the pandemic era, especially between 2021 and mid-2023, companies scrambling to fill roles competed with eye-popping wage bumps. Employees switching jobs regularly saw salary hikes of around 16%, particularly in sectors like hospitality and retail. Job postings advertised unprecedented pay, and workers seized on their newfound leverage, often quitting roles in droves to pursue better offers—a phenomenon that became known as the Great Resignation.

But as the dust has settled, the labor pendulum has begun swinging back. With demand cooling and layoffs mounting through 2024, negotiating power is shifting back toward employers. According to a 2023 ZipRecruiter report, nearly half of US companies surveyed admitted to lowering advertised wages for certain roles, justifying the reductions as a reset following the hiring frenzy of prior years.

The tightening labor market, marked by fewer job openings and rising unemployment, has left employees with reduced leverage—and bosses with the upper hand.

Return-to-office is discipline disguised as policy

Perhaps the most visible expression of employer revenge is the sweeping return-to-office (RTO) mandates. What began as a gradual shift in late 2023 has, in 2025, hardened into uncompromising policies. CEOs insist on five-day in-office workweeks; workers who resist face discipline or termination. While some companies cite collaboration and productivity, it really serves a different purpose.

Research confirms what many workers suspected: for some employers, RTO is a thinly veiled headcount reduction. Executives know that forcing remote staff back into rigid office settings will prompt resignations, thus shrinking payroll without overt layoffs. This tactic has disproportionately affected employees who thrived under pandemic-era flexibility, and is widely viewed by labor advocates as retribution for years of worker autonomy.

Pay cuts and ‘adjustments’: rolling back the clock

Beyond RTO, companies are quietly rolling back pandemic-era pay raises. Industries hardest hit by the Great Resignation—hospitality, retail, healthcare—have begun to freeze wages or implement graduated pay cuts. Perhaps CEOs are lashing out because they aren’t so safe themselves: Turnover in the top job hit a five-year high in 2023 and has stayed escalated since. Employment consultant Challenger, Gray & Christmas dubbed 2025 the start of the “CEO gig economy.”

Some firms justify reductions by claiming wage growth exceeded inflation, while others simply cite the need to reset compensation to pre-pandemic norms. The result: Workers hired in the bo-m now find themselves faced with smaller paychecks for the same jobs, if they’re lucky enough to keep those jobs at all.

Employee backlash: revenge quitting on the rise

This “big payback” hasn’t gone unanswered. Discontented workers, especially Gen Z and millennials, are fueling a new trend: “revenge quitting.” Unlike “quiet quitting” or “slow disengagement,” revenge quitting is abrupt and often timed to inflict maximum disruption, such as during critical business periods.

There’s also anecdotal evidence of “revenge RTO“: workers acting up in all kinds of small ways to quietly protest the increasingly top-down work environment they have been thrust back into. Reddit’s AntiWork forum has a whole thread documenting (and brainstorming) “subtle acts of resistance.” The boss may have ordered workers back, but they can choose to never answer their phone in the office, over-socializing, or even intentionally burning popcorn in the microwave.

In fact, the workplace in the mid-2020s resembles nothing so much as a jungle, with all sorts of different worker fauna, adapted in various ways to dodge the great resentment wave. Take the emergence of the “coffee badger,” a worker who swipes their badge to get into the office just long enough to have some facetime with colleagues, likely making sure their boss sees them, have a cup of office coffee, and scramble back home. The coffee badger is a millennial species, as midcareer workers have often settled into a groove of years of remote work and they don’t like emerging from their hole as much as Gen Z, who is surprisingly eager for in-person mentorship and old-school office vibes.

The CEOs brimming with resentment over loss of status and power may be enjoying their moment of revenge, but they should stay attuned to all the emerging species of office sloths. Resentment, after all, is a two-way street, and it’s a jungle out there

by
| 2133 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k34j5zdr

11 replies (most recent on top)

“But it was pretty big and resulted in everyone on my team being at the minimum of the payband.”

Guess you didn’t get a huge raise either if you are at the bottom. I remember that market adjustment. If you got a big raise, you were way underpaid. A lot of people that came in from outside didn’t get anything, as we were already in the band. ATT has underpaid for so long in technical roles it was more like you got to the bare minimum of what you should have been making all along.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1k34j5zdr

Except T never gave out that raise.

Guess you don’t have a in demand job or you’re already riding high in your pay band

There was a market adjustment of the payband for my job title. I don’t remember the amount. But it was pretty big and resulted in everyone on my team being at the minimum of the payband.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @df+1k34j5zdr

@OP

"There’s also anecdotal evidence of “revenge RTO“: workers acting up in all kinds of small ways to quietly protest the increasingly top-down work environment they have been thrust back into."

I've been ba----g this drum for months and it's great to get a little traction. I hope that more and more resentful and oppositional workers join in, in their own ways.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1k34j5zdr

This makes SO much sense. Really great read. T followed this exactly. Job title changes and alignment to higher salary bands. Sudden pay boosts. Had us all feeling good - even valued for once. And now the shift. It all makes sense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1k34j5zdr

Now it all makes sense, I kept wondering when and why “leadership” made the pivot to start treating employees as the enemy. The Great Resentment is upon us and Stank the biggest poster child.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1k34j5zdr

When did we get that " once-in-a-generation raise"? Was it my 1.5467843% raise?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1k34j5zdr

TLDR---Seeing more and more AI posts these days

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1k34j5zdr

The job market is extremely tough at the moment. But, things will shift in the other direction, they always do. When that happens, going to be a mass exodus here. Heck most of the company is retirement eligible now and just waiting on Medicare before leaving. I bet in the next couple years, most people will retire probably cutting almost 1/2 the emoloyees. Now imagine that in the next 1-5 years amplified just about everywhere where most people retire at other companies. Couple that with a crackdown on inshoring and offshoring, boy the market is going to be ripe. AI = just another Indian. Sorry but that’s fact. Most of it doesn’t do what they think it does. Regardless of if the stank wants to cut the workforce in half, you’re going to still need people to do work, does he think people will want to work here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1k34j5zdr

The whole point of Ask ATT was for the employees to train the LLM so that they are more easily replaced.

You seen this statement on multiple posts “losing so much knowledge with these layoffs “.

There is no loss of knowledge if you keep using AI because it’s whole job is to learn everything you do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1k34j5zdr

Except T never gave out that raise.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k34j5zdr

Good posts but with the advancement of technological surveillance and the supposed speed of AI to parse vast amounts of information this might be a dangerous move. If some of this comes to fruition it might not be a catch me if you can situation. As these processes become more refined the so called “outlier” group will become larger. In the Legg investor interview he mentioned a huge number of AI projects being worked on. These issues are probably part of that portfolio. Job market might not be growing but know some who have been out of work for months regardless of the “I left and found a much better job” stuff that is posted on this board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k34j5zdr

Post a reply

: