Thread regarding Capital One layoffs

after 20 years of being sued by employees forced ranking still exists

Their forced ranking system has been the subject of class action lawsuit since at least 2003. C One stated they would stop doing forced ranking in 2003 but never did and it's 2023. See article below.

https://www.plansponsor.com/workers-hit-capital-one-with-2nd-age-discrimination-lawsuit/

Workers Hit Capital One With 2nd Age Discrimination Lawsuit
December 4, 2003 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A Virginia-based consumer finance company has been hit with a second age-discrimination lawsuit alleging it gave preference to younger workers.
Reported by FRED SCHNEYER

Five former employees, ranging in age from 40 to 62 filed the lawsuit against Capital One Financial Corp.,. in US District Court in Richmond, arguing that a disproportionately high number of older employees were fired for purported poor performance, according to an Associated Press report. This was true even though the affected workers had met or exceeded expectations in previous job appraisals, the suit claimed.

Capital One settled a similar lawsuit with as many as 60 former workers for an undisclosed amount in June. AARP, the nonprofit organization for people 50 and older, was co-counsel in that lawsuit.

Meanwhile, four of the plaintiffs in the latest case were in middle management, and one was an hourly employee. Some received separation and other benefits, plus additional pay equivalent to eight weeks’ salary from Capital One if they agreed not to sue for age discrimination.

The employees allege that the waivers were illegal and part of a plan to deter legal challenges. The company implemented a rigorous forced-ranking employee-appraisal system that led to the firings. In a forced ranking, a certain percentage of employees must get low grades – which lead to termination.

Capital One has backed off the forced-ranking system since it was implemented in fall 2001, according to the lawsuit. The company employs about 18,800 workers – half of them in the Richmond area.

by
| 2358 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kXMGuWT

6 replies (most recent on top)

Three older women in my small group have been “aged out” in 2025. They’re running out of ladies to let-go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3vgg+1kXMGuWT

I honestly don’t understand how C1 routinely gets voted one of the “best places to work.” They also have the ethics team working night and day trying to get C1 recognized as “one of the most ethical companies.” It’s a farce. The company is full of overcompensated ego maniacs who have all lost any sense of reality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5mxw+1kXMGuWT

All this talk of suing the company is crazy talk. I know folks who have tried to sue over the years and no lawyer will take a case against Capital One. I witnessed so much 'funny stuff' over my decades of employment. I worked directly with some of the folks who successfully sued in the early 2000s. They were great folks, but they were over 50. I had only myself to blame for staying in that toxic culture, but I toughed it out and made my life outside of work. The feeling of leaving it all behind was so incredible. Every day I wake up I realize how much I let that place control my life. Either find a new gig, retire or quiet quit if you are miserable. Very few jobs are going to be perfect, but I am sure most are better than dealing with the toxic environment that festers here. Good luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4fte+1kXMGuWT

You need AARP or ACLU to sue otherwise you’ll pay tens of thousands of dollars in lawyers fees. Take the severance package and then file with EEOC….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qix+1kXMGuWT

They're €astard$

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xvc+1kXMGuWT

Sue them into oblivion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gii+1kXMGuWT

Post a reply

: