Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

For all employees...which companies should you apply to that don't have the same problems as Cisco?

We all know that many tech companies have the LR disease.....it's the industry wide "EASY" button for financial and forecasting mistakes. But it doesn't have to be that way.

So which companies do you recommend, and which ones do you not recommend, due to the same problems Cisco has? I think this list would be great for everyone. If you dig around this webpage for a while, you'll see many other companies with horrible cultures and dysfunctional ELTs. We should avoid those at all costs, and reward the companies that actually know how to run a business ethically and with compassion.

Maybe I'm kidding myself and all tech companies are suffering the same diseases.

by
| 1948 views | | 2 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kkgMLco

2 replies (most recent on top)

Cisco does some world leading hardware and for those on the few teams still doing it they’re building world class skills. There aren’t many alternatives.

Cisco does some world trailing software and bug “fixing” (I’m being very euphemistic) ancient code in an ancient language where no one actually knows how to develop concise well designed and written code is the antithesis of what you want in a career. Smaller companies where you can take on a broader set of responsibilities is a much better place to be if you’re self motivated enough to keep learning and growing, but if you’re at Cisco in your 30s that may no longer be an option. Watching Youtube videos from high titled talent at FAANG makes it clear many of those companies have a lot of incompetence which further points to smaller companies.

I remember when IT saved a few pennies with cheaper NAS devices significantly increasing the already multi-hour build times decimating engineering budgets, and given the never ending network and phone problems (odd given Cisco’s business) there have to be better options to grow your skills.

Then you have sales, marketing, procurement, production, facilities and other careers where the tradeoffs are quite different from those above. At the end of the day Nirvana Corp. doesn’t exist and it’s up to you to figure out how you want to grow your career, and that will dictate which companies are best for you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jlc+1kkgMLco

Publicly traded companies are mostly the same. They are looking for methods to reduce full-time employees and replace them with contractors. No health insurance, 401k, PTO, or severance to worry about... very easy to layoff a batch of contractors before the holidays to boost profitability

Avoid corporations that rely on acquisitions to obtain revenue growth. Apple doesn't need to spend billions on acquisitions to stay afloat. Cisco spends billions to implement a simple product feature.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mpv+1kkgMLco

Post a reply

: