Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM CEO commits to reaching Quantum computing milestone by 2029

Link --> https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/ibm-ceo-commits-to-reaching-quantum-computing-milestone-by-2029/ar-AA24GHxd?ocid=msedgntp&pc=W099&cvid=6a2049f56af74598af51294d8ec381d8&ei=9

If you believe this stuff will be available in 2029, then you'll believe anything and... I have bridge to sell you in London. No mention of Arvind's golden boy, Dario in this article.
BUT...
What happens if the fabled quantum computers fail to materialize in 2029 ? Where will Arvind and Dario be ? Basking in the sun somewhere in the Caribbean or hiding from the Italian Mafia underground ? After all, a billion dollars is a lot of $$$. ($10 billion is even more). LOL.


by
| 168 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kt72yppn

5 replies (most recent on top)

@a8 I am one and you are correct

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1kt72yppn

@an To say IBM is leading in AI is HILARIOUS! You should be a comedian. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1kt72yppn

Link to original article on primary source --

https://www.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/ibm-ceo-commits-to-quantum-computing-milestone

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1kt72yppn

People have been predicting IBM's demise for decades, yet here it is still leading in enterprise technology, AI, and quantum research. Whether the 2029 milestone is achieved exactly on schedule or not, at least Arvind Krishna is investing in the future instead of managing decline. Under his leadership, IBM has strengthened its AI portfolio, expanded hybrid cloud capabilities, and remains one of the world's leading quantum computing companies. It's easy to mock ambitious goals; it's harder to build the technology that could make them reality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1kt72yppn

If you conducted an anonymous survey of the scientists and engineers who actually work in the field of Quantum Computing and asked the question, "will commercially viable fault tolerant Quantum Computers exist in 2029?" - 100% of them will answer "NO". Again, that's assuming it's anonymous and assuming they can somehow be assured than an honest answer will not reduce funding flowing into the field.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kt72yppn

Post a reply

: