Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Employee Survey is bad

In CLT technology and told the employee survey was bad this year. Are they really surprised? I bet BE’s explanation will be that the 12,000 people in her org are wrong and it’s not her. They just don’t get her “leadership”. Anyone else getting any information?


by
| 1031 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kwtm26m6

10 replies (most recent on top)

@OP my group saw the survey and how we compared to the enterprise as a whole even though the directive was not to release to us. Zero surprises. i don’t remember every question and response but I can’t say I saw anything in the 70% or higher. All the typical satisfaction things were 30’s to 50’s. But apparently there are factions that are happy here so it is what it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1kwtm26m6

We have yet to see our result in Tech

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dr+1kwtm26m6

I quit taking the survey a few years ago, with the opinion that not taking the it is the safest, most honest way of giving feedback. If they’re measuring “employee engagement,” and no one engages from the point of measurement, then they get an idea from there. (Though it won’t make a difference.)

My assumption is that the results over-represent positives anyway. When you take a survey, knowing it’s confidential and not anonymous, how honest will your feedback be?

Leaders talk about competing with one another on having their teams complete the survey. Why should I help? The last time I gave honest feedback, the employees were told to sit in a room and figure out how to make it better. That changed everything (at least from my decision to respond).

When at least 7 completed surveys for a manager are required to see individual team results, and a team of 7 has one non-respondent, then no detail for that manager. Pity. I don’t care that the manager doesn’t get their ratings. I don’t worry that my responses will come back to haunt me. And I’m not naive enough to think anything said in that poorly constructed survey will change anything in the first place. /rant

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dd+1kwtm26m6

They'll cook the books either way. Or justify AI sunk cost by saying we're missing the right tools, that's why.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1kwtm26m6

Entire top and middle level should give status report to all his group workers what they are working daily. This will give a clue where we are heading.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1kwtm26m6

Isn't this the goal? Charlie wants people to hate working here so they leave. You think they didn't want the results to look like this? I'd go as far as to say they are probably dissapointed that it's not worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1kwtm26m6

Their solution will be to displace the respondents who answered negatively.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c6+1kwtm26m6

@a1
Criminals?
Please stop admiring them and giving them the attention they do no deserve.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1kwtm26m6

Any details

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kwtm26m6

These criminals live in an echo chamber. They'll change the results to fit their narrative. It's been this way for years. Everyone knows it's incompetence run wild. Nothing will be done. Board of directors don't give a damn so unless major federal laws are broken, no one will care the abuse they heap on hard-working employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kwtm26m6

Post a reply

: