They announced DSG exit this week. What other impact among DCAI? Will they look to trim other solution group like PSG?
5 replies (most recent on top)
not profitable... not gonna do it...
if you are part of a team working on product that don't generate earnings, you might want to move to another team...
(all except for IFS, which is unprofitable but is part of the 'moonshot' or DEI hires who are untouchable even if meritocracy is missing)
The NUC is probably the Next Unit Chopped as non-essential biz.
LOL on those two articles.
They should've stopped manufacturing servers a LONG time ago. They used to manufacture desktops and workstations, too.
It's definitely NOT a bad thing that Intel wants to work with ARM on compatibility. Their goal is to become a foundry. They MUST be able to manufacture ARM-based products. It's not optional.
@tqi+1m6z8856
"go faster with less..."
Intel's competitors do so much more with less so yes this is what is expected top down. Issue is Intel systems (i.e. CE!, automation, + other perceived strengths that actually are weakness) and bureaucracy/ cascaded decision making. Intel needs cultural revolution to compete. Good luck.
I found this hard to believe until I did a search, here's an article:
https://www.servethehome.com/breaking-intel-exiting-the-server-business-selling-to-mitac/
This is BAD, and so is THIS:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/intel-arm-chip-manufacturing-compatibility-130631506.html
Very sad days for Intel! :(
I left the company because I got tired of thrash, being told to go faster with less, and the company throwing unnecessary obstacles in the way to trip us up. Glad I left when I did, but still, this is depressing stuff.