TD as a PnL... won't that be something. Those people are at the heart of the cultural problems at Intel.
When they had the leadership, they would tell the design teams what the could and couldn't have.
And if you weren't asking for high power or anything that isn't needed for processor or chipset you weren't going to get it.
So it is laughable to me that Intel now thinks it can do IFS... Because to do that, you have to be flexible and responsive to customers. You have to provide many nodes and many different libraries and of course performance/watt is every bit (if not more) important that performance only.
I hope that can teach on old dog a new trick... but I wouldn't put any money on it.