Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

The Whale for IFS and give margin and business to your competitor

Why are Intel outsourcing the majority of it's 3nm demand through 2025. This high margin product will be built in Taiwan and they'll realize the lion's share of the product margin??

$14B in potential GDP being outsourced to Taiwan and China???

They are marking up your capacity 30% over Apples, as they don't want to fund a foundry competitor.

Obviously you don't have confidence you can produce 3nm in volume due to 50% lower yields and reliability issues...

The current strategy is very sub optimal and isn't sustainable post 2025.

Someone needs to do some splainin'

Reports from Ronler Acres and Ireland show a complete disconnect between the rhetoric of the executives and the reality on the ground in Oregon and Leixlip. Intel 4 was transferred while not meeting die yield and process capability criteria. The oxide layer module has a Cpk of less than 4 sigma.

The process su-ks at least 600% more power for a given AI work load. Gate Current leakage is the root cause of what will be extreme power consumption at the data centers. Most developers are balking at deploying an Intel solution for the data center customers. 6x+ power consumption equals 6x+ CO2 being generated at the gas or coal turbine facilities.

by
| 1453 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1pTDYvhJ

4 replies (most recent on top)

Title -> yield

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ikj+1pTDYvhJ

I thought it was pretty disingenuous to hide performance and title etc under okrs for "carbon footprint" (Which is red)

Maybe if Intel was more honest and open internally they'd do better

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pbr+1pTDYvhJ

Why would any BU use Intel or IFS… from pricing point of view and technology make make sense, but from IFS point of view what a money losing situation pretty FUBAR

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwq+1pTDYvhJ

Have been through this transition, realization 3 times now. Intel is the only one left to make the difficult life decision that decides if they slowly sink or rise up.

The product (BU) should be evaluation each tech node DK and picking the best one for their product and focus on schedules, TTM, and how to win in the market with their product. If that's an Intel process, TSMC, or Samsung, let the BU make th decision they need to.

In other words, separate the chip BUs from the process tech node BU entirely.

Participate in the market efficiently and u have a chance of all these BUs being great. But if u bury ur head in the sand. You got what I currently have and u know what u need to do. So do it. Or not. That's ur decision to make.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ivq+1pTDYvhJ

Post a reply

: