Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

New year, new name = SBS

Any thoughts on this new Strategic Business solutions nonsense

by
| 2987 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qrpDvWo

12 replies (most recent on top)

Just another way for the top brass to hide high PSG slobs until they can retire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qiy+1qrpDvWo

It just baffles me that the ELT actually sat in a room thinking this was a good idea. Let's get back to basics of finding and producing oil & gas. Or is that too hard a topic for these people at the top.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3bay+1qrpDvWo

Heard it was originally Strategic Business Strategies

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3dtr+1qrpDvWo

The year started off fine until Mark Nelson sent that email. God help anyone who reports into that guy

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vmp+1qrpDvWo

Is this a BCG or McKinsey recommendation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bho+1qrpDvWo

I’m not committing it to memory because I know it will change after the inevitable reorg in the next 18 months.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1whf+1qrpDvWo

How much did we pay a consultant to make that up

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nmk+1qrpDvWo

Stop with the trick questions. Anything with “strategic” in it is simply a misnomer at Chevron.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1feg+1qrpDvWo

This is the name I would give my company if it were to specialize in servicing public toilets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ahk+1qrpDvWo

My first impression of seeing the letters, SPD was the word, “Stupid”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iip+1qrpDvWo

Super BxxxSxxx! oh Yes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lxk+1qrpDvWo

Ridiculous. The old name (SPD) only lasted 15 months.
In isolation, the name also sounds subordinate to CSS which it obviously isn’t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @otl+1qrpDvWo

Post a reply

: