Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

The Path Forward

You read in John’s message last week (2 months late after ruining your Christmas but a day early to sc--w your weekend) that in order to compete and win, we must fire a few people for what we now think matters most because the last thing didn’t work. To buy us time before Wall Street realizes we’ve made the brand stale, we will more sharply align our organization with our old strategy and continue the old journey we began last year. This means we’ve had to make some tough decisions and to be fair tougher for you really. The toughest part for me was filtering through the spreadsheet for the people we were firing which is why it took so long.

I know this was a difficult week across the company, and I can see your in empty eyes as you walk around WHQ that you are sick and tired of being sick and tired. Saying goodbye to teammates, colleagues and friends is never easy, which is why most of you never even call them after they fail in this go around of the hunger games. Please know that we are working with all impacted individuals and legal will be supporting us to make sure they don’t sc--w us over during their transition. As of today, we’ve fired all the people who are getting fired for now and the rest of you will just have to spend Q4 worried if you’re going to be fired. I suggest holding off on booking that summer vacation.
Our teams in EMEA will be on a different timeline due to them living in a country that actually cares about workers and truthfully Mo hasn’t found a loophole like she did for the WARN act. And as for China, we can’t just fire those people, we’re not that d-mb.

Take care of yourself and we’ll come together soon and where we will give you 2 drink tickets to make this memory go away… ok maybe 3.

Best,
Soon to be former VP.

by
| 2086 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rfT8Mki

5 replies (most recent on top)

Dear OP, Thank you posting it was a refreshing read.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hqc+1rfT8Mki

You forgot option 3.

Try to do option 2 but fumble the ball so hard you end up giving more than 60 days notice, just not through the government.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iik+1rfT8Mki

To me, the WARN is doing exactly what it's supposed to do, giving people some time to prepare. Tell me, honestly, which would you rather have.

  1. 60 days notice that you might get laid off in writing with WARN, then termination and no severance
  2. No warning that you might get laid off, but a generous severance to help a little through transition to a new job where you are getting paid but not having to work.

Personally, I prefer #2.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ood+1rfT8Mki

It was really awesome. Thank you OP

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xfa+1rfT8Mki

Is that you JD?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hys+1rfT8Mki

Post a reply

: