Thread regarding Phillips 66 layoffs

Rodeo Renewed/ Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex

Thoughts on the success of Phillips 66 rodeo renewed plant in CA? They state that everything seems to be going good online and running at full rates 50MBD... but something seems to tell me otherwise?!

How long until we will know if this is going to actually workout or be profitable?

by
| 2121 views | | 16 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tV8Rtaw

16 replies (most recent on top)

The renewables are highly dependent on the tax credits which are not firm but are ambitious. The long term payback will also be largely tied to the credits (read - subsidies)

CA was the right place to do it specifically because of the the benefits to the regulatory requirements.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ihux+1tV8Rtaw

Are we really comparing Alliance to the world’s largest refinery…. If the dump can’t turn a profit one year out of ten then it’s not worth a damn to anyone. Our only mistake there was not shutting it down a decade sooner, but leave it to management to mismanage its assets.

As a wise man once said, you can count on P66 doing the right thing after exhausting all other options.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gopl+1tV8Rtaw

And the world’s largest refinery has a Nelson index of?

  1. 1 - Paraguana 955mbd
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cxzo+1tV8Rtaw

Naw, you just need to make Rodeo renewed a special k refinery. Look at the market value that Californians pay for that product.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aqux+1tV8Rtaw

Literally, other than the tankage and the land, there was nothing there that you could convert into a biofuels plant. Place was hardly even a refinery. What? 7 Nelson complexity?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9uvf+1tV8Rtaw

A hydrocracker might be around the cost overrun….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9wfl+1tV8Rtaw

Alliance didn't have the kit. Only reason Rodeo was a good candidate was the the hydrocrackers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8nqx+1tV8Rtaw

Shoulda converted alliance and stayed in a deregulated state.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8wgo+1tV8Rtaw

For those who think this will add significant bottom line to the company, consider that 50,000 bpd = just 2.5% of P66's 2 million BPD daily refinery production. Second, this is only a transition step toward reducing greenhouse emissions. Within a decade, production at this facility will likely be curtailed due to more severe regulations as the effects of climate change continue to become more severe. End of the day, biofuel or petrofuel both pump gigatons of CO2 into the air when combusted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7udq+1tV8Rtaw

That’s just a small fee to get a promotion up the corporate ladder. I mean, that’s the cost of business right? He got his 1 and RSU’s.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4dzn+1tV8Rtaw

Rodeo lost $55 Million last quarter. I'd say it's going great!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3wjd+1tV8Rtaw

But, but, but, they said this was going to add $700,000,000 annually to the bottom line.
Surely they wouldn’t lie about something like that.
Ha, ha, ha!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gts+1tV8Rtaw

The problem isn't whether they are operating well, it's that the quantities being produced are tiny and probably limited by feedstock availabilty. There's only so much used cooking oil to go around, ya know?
This will never be a significant addition to overall profit, but has much more PR value. The board now has something shiny to point at to suggest that P66 is really doing something about climate change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jtx+1tV8Rtaw

Going to take a while to pay off that over run? #ROI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tmh+1tV8Rtaw

Peter is an a--hole how don't want P66 and its employees to succeed

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2swj+1tV8Rtaw

I think they’re running pretty good but the margins and the renewable credits are not as high as anticipated. Uh Oh!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ogq+1tV8Rtaw

Post a reply

: