Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

It appears that Intel completely missed a business cycle. The root cause came long before the PG return. Help them understand.

by
| 1088 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1u7k7mtx

8 replies (most recent on top)

Nice try, Pat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wha+1u7k7mtx

He will probably Intel last CEO hanging on the cross for display. Jesus Christ !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rjo+1u7k7mtx

Pat tried to swallow what he can manage and now he chocked. Expanding too fast now when there are no customer orders to fill the fab. If the board seeing what is going on right now, the foundry business needs to be separated from Intel. Pat keep dreaming that his foundry business will save the company, he will sink the whole ship even faster.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qcb+1u7k7mtx

Pat is a the megachurch pastor of Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rch+1u7k7mtx

Pat is on the hook for 13th and 14th gen sc--w ups, for draining the profitability out of the company right now, and for not understanding the current market. Happy now?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ony+1u7k7mtx

For @eup+1u7k7mtx
When Pat was CTO at Intel, the company missed Mobile (for smartphone, etc.), flash memory and GPU (Larrabee).
The BOARD made a mistake bringing back Pat!
https://www.tekinsil.com/SemiconductorsBill/US_Semiconductor_Bill.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zse+1u7k7mtx

A cycle??? Intel fell off the bike in 2005.. the parts of the cycle were stolen ... and there is not even a nut left to sc--w us today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rqy+1u7k7mtx

Fu-k Pat. He was part of the problem before they pushed him out and again now. The board should have never brought him back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eup+1u7k7mtx

Post a reply

: