Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

AMA CX Leadership - Toni, Jacq, Emma and more

I'm afraid it's a total disaster. The leadership isn't prepared to answer the pressing questions, and they seem clueless about the purpose of the new roles being created. The CSS team is getting increasingly frustrated as their inquiries remain unanswered. Leadership needs time to figure out how to provide satisfactory explanations, but it's really disappointing. The way these new roles are being handled feels inadequate, and morale among CX employees is at an all-time low. You can feel the tension on the ground, especially as important questions come up and leadership struggles to respond.

Here are some key questions that need addressing:

  1. Why are new roles like CSM being created if they overlap with existing CSS roles?
  1. Are these new roles intended to replace the current CSS positions? Should we expect CSS to be impacted in the next layoffs?
  1. If CSS is deemed essential for the organization, why aren’t more CSS employees being hired instead of CSMs, whose job descriptions closely resemble those of CSS?
  1. New job openings for CSS are listed at grade 11. Why are these openings at a higher grade than the current CSS positions, which remain at grade 10? What’s preventing promotions for existing CSS staff? Will there be no more career progression?
  1. With the recent departures of CSE/SPM, how will current CSS support customers effectively?
  1. How do the new roles of CXM and CSM differ from CSE/SPM?
  1. Why aren't the existing CSE/SPM roles being transitioned to the new CXM/CSM positions?
  1. What measures are in place to ensure the new CX model is more effective than previous ones?
  1. Who will take ownership and accountability for the success or failure of this new model if it doesn't work out? ELT?

And many more. Feel free to comment and add on. Just personally feel this also a path to failure.

by
| 2603 views | | 15 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1uAA39a5

15 replies (most recent on top)

Build great products and you don’t need CX.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4hvj+1uAA39a5

Its race to showcase who is the most incompetent CX leader in the company. As time goes CX leadership and their pu**ies will show more and more clueless brain function across the org.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jbr+1uAA39a5

I can hear Lavanya struggling to answer and pushing it to her own AMA. This is hilarious.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jaj+1uAA39a5

Emma who lead the deployment of a PowerPoint AI clone? That seemed like the most dubious achievement I've seen at Cisco.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xss+1uAA39a5

Dear CX let me answer all your questions for you.

The reason they don’t have answers is because how can they politely tell everyone the reason we’re doing this is because you are all sh-t at your jobs?

CSM lines up with what the market is doing and makes sense for software business models. Leadership did mismanage CX but it was from them not finding people who could think outside the box and apply basic problem solving skills with customers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lhy+1uAA39a5

How many AMA they are going to held at a later date will not have a good answer on all these questions. Can’t you see yesterday they are throwing the ball around.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xsz+1uAA39a5

The reference to Nortel towards the end of the meeting was most unfortunate.
Way to motivate the surviving but severely bruised peeps!
Fantastic leadership skills and 5 stars on Emotional Intelligence !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bmu+1uAA39a5

This boring meeting is just held for the sake of being held, but even if it is a show, these people are not qualified. Look at the background of their meeting place and their clothes. Are they taking this meeting seriously?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wsb+1uAA39a5

CX is a big flop thus the departure of Tony, Chris, Elissa, Maria ...so on
the backend of CX was DL which is toasted, scrambled and taken over by KAO, credentials are questionable. Same note, the DL engineering leadership was arrogant, adamant and brainless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cqf+1uAA39a5

They expect and mentioned that CSS are technical. I had worked with some CSS who know sh-t and doesn't even know what basic subnetting is. All they does are just pulling in other CSS to do their job for them. Pathetic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xfu+1uAA39a5

Leadership needs to show progress, so they create new roles, and move people around. When that fails, LR. Make more changes, you get the drift…. Rinse and repeat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tsv+1uAA39a5

To add on to the poster that brought up her GSSO lack of leadership, she lied many times to the field. It was one lie after another. She never had answers and never had a plan. Go ask those in GSSO that are left or those that she cut. She always says people first. It is always her first and the only time she put people first was when it came to LRs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lgr+1uAA39a5

Excellent analysis

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qcw+1uAA39a5

Emma is a disaster. She was leading GSSO before going to CX, and she never had a plan in GSSO. Under her regime of incompetence, she had 3 LRs in 2 years and could never put a plan together. At the beginning of FY24, she did away with all the hyper specialists roles and had no plan. No one had access to tools and we still do not today. She is the most inept leader I have ever seen in my career. She single handily destroyed the security sales business. Looks like she is now destroying CS too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ksk+1uAA39a5

Totally spot on. Glad that we have these sessions. But having burning questions not answer left us all dangling. Moral on the ground is all time low by looking at the questions posted on the chat. I am not going to work till answers are given. Reinventing CX? put the customer at the center of everything we do? What a joke when you are doing all these to your current employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sks+1uAA39a5

Post a reply

: