I'm afraid it's a total disaster. The leadership isn't prepared to answer the pressing questions, and they seem clueless about the purpose of the new roles being created. The CSS team is getting increasingly frustrated as their inquiries remain unanswered. Leadership needs time to figure out how to provide satisfactory explanations, but it's really disappointing. The way these new roles are being handled feels inadequate, and morale among CX employees is at an all-time low. You can feel the tension on the ground, especially as important questions come up and leadership struggles to respond.
Here are some key questions that need addressing:
- Why are new roles like CSM being created if they overlap with existing CSS roles?
- Are these new roles intended to replace the current CSS positions? Should we expect CSS to be impacted in the next layoffs?
- If CSS is deemed essential for the organization, why aren’t more CSS employees being hired instead of CSMs, whose job descriptions closely resemble those of CSS?
- New job openings for CSS are listed at grade 11. Why are these openings at a higher grade than the current CSS positions, which remain at grade 10? What’s preventing promotions for existing CSS staff? Will there be no more career progression?
- With the recent departures of CSE/SPM, how will current CSS support customers effectively?
- How do the new roles of CXM and CSM differ from CSE/SPM?
- Why aren't the existing CSE/SPM roles being transitioned to the new CXM/CSM positions?
- What measures are in place to ensure the new CX model is more effective than previous ones?
- Who will take ownership and accountability for the success or failure of this new model if it doesn't work out? ELT?
And many more. Feel free to comment and add on. Just personally feel this also a path to failure.