Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

GSSO Engineering Support Needed for 25% Growth

As a Security Account Executive in GSSO, it boggles one’s mind how the engineering support required for us to grow 25% is not available to us.

The GSSO Engineering VP is completely clueless to what is happening in the field. Regular GSSO Engineers are required to know 30+ solutions without any support and are working 50-60 hours a week due to this.

The GSSO Incubation Teams only have to know 1 solution and can say “No” to things they do not want to do even if it is a part of their one solution. I have requested Incubation supper multiple times and it is an act of congress to actually get support from them. My peers have faced the same issue. What good is this group if they say “no” most of then time.

The GSSO Engineering VP refuses to acknowledge any issues. Our new Global Security Sales VP is not doing anything about it.

by
| 852 views | | 7 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1uqXn0vc

7 replies (most recent on top)

GSSO ENG is a mess, lots of great talent already left the building. Ki-ling specialists and putting so much pressure on the GSSO SEs to be experts in all products was crazy. The products are horribly integrated (i.e. not integrated as a platform). Thus, each solution must compete with established (and more niche) players that have focused and SEs that can go deep on their solutions. Instead, GSSO SEs have to compete at 30,000 feet.

Incubation makes little sense, they should be specialists, but instead they're tasked with GTM work, training the field, testing new features. To the others' points, they don't actually do any "selling".

Good luck competing against the stellar SEs that know their stuff DEEP at Zscaler, Okta, Crowdstrike, Proofpoint, PAN, etc. No help from partners either, MS Partners can own the technical sales and deployment, Cisco has no partners that can help with security sales and/or deployments.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1inr+1uqXn0vc

Cisco makes security products? News to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xne+1uqXn0vc

The GSSO Engineering VP has made continuous misinformed decisions that has penalized us in sales. JH, KO and the incubation teams are not helpful. I concur with the OP that the incubation teams regularly say “no” to the field even on the solutions they cover. They have put too many solutions on the SEs while the incubation teams get to focus on one solution and dictate what they will do and won’t do with that one solution. What a joke. TS has no idea what is going on. He needs to be LRd.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bkk+1uqXn0vc

The sales vp?! He just got here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fvl+1uqXn0vc

Did this VP gave any road map or solution how this can be achieved ?
Or just his fantasy ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ull+1uqXn0vc

Problem is the middle/FLM management team not passing correct information to the upper. They are a bunch of 'YES' man. Everything is workable no problem and push down mission impossible to the field engineer.
I used to see Director demand hourly report to developers for release without customer, this is one example of our leader quality

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ykc+1uqXn0vc

I saw VP name in LR list. Time to move on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gnz+1uqXn0vc

Post a reply

: