Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Language

They love "impacted" because that is something that randomly happens to you. You havent been impacted, they have laid you off.
They love LR because it sound like some kind of medicine, but really you have not been a victom of a "limted restructure" you have been laid off.
Have fun - make them say it.

by
| 1572 views | | 15 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1us3i9y4

15 replies (most recent on top)

Let-go, that's what I will say instead of fired or laid off if Cisco LRs me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ibn+1us3i9y4

how about this company re-balances my rsu portfolio so i can do some personal restructuring of my own

tired of all these pc bs names, wish they would stop trying to sugar coat layoffs.
if this company wasn't constantly losing business to competition or shifting to cloud, there wouldn't need to be all these layoffs.

this company hasn't innovated new product from the ground up since the router. everything is an acquisition for them. and then they fail at integrating it into their core products because their sour politics and lr's jettison leading talent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oho+1us3i9y4

Layoffs were originally a temporary thing. "Neutron Jack" Welch of GE changed its meaning to "fired" in the early 1980s and with each softening of the name it still means "fired."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ens+1us3i9y4

I think last round each person impacted was referred to as a “business case”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fgc+1us3i9y4

Bottom line, you’ve been fired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bjc+1us3i9y4

In medical terms, impacted means something is wedged or blocked in a body passage or cavity, or that broken bones are driven together.

It's the ELT that's "impacted", i.e., full of sh-t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @smu+1us3i9y4

Workforce transition is a fancy name to get permission to lie! They said they were moving people to growth areas, and it was not to cut costs, yet growth and profitable areas like security were impacted in the past!

There is no accountability from the market for Chuck or Scott! How can they tell continue to tell lies to shareholders and employees and get away with this?? Most investors and shareholders don't care as long they make profit, but if you can't trust a CEO and CFO on their word, that's a problem!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mpu+1us3i9y4

The language doesn't matter. The outcome is the same. You're either in or you're out. Simple as that. If you haven't been preparing, that's on you. If you choose to stay in this whack-a-mole LR process, that's on you. I know employees wish their leaders gave a damn, but they just don't, they never have. As Chambers used to say "live in the world the way it is, not the way you wish it could be." When people show you who they are, believe them. And get out as soon as possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tou+1us3i9y4

Workforce Transition Options is another one. Lmao.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvt+1us3i9y4

They should use RUF. Rug pulled from Under your Feet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aik+1us3i9y4

Splunk has requested to remove the word "Impacted" from all their employee communication not to scare people. Laughable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ctm+1us3i9y4

RIF is another "it just happened to you" phrase. They laid you off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qhy+1us3i9y4

Cisco might be the only company that calls a layoff an “LR”. It’s always been called a RIF everywhere I have worked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kmb+1us3i9y4

But never “Cost cutting”. That’s evil word.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @epr+1us3i9y4

Don’t forget “rebalancing”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dkd+1us3i9y4

Post a reply

: