Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Individuals impacted told today after a more than 6 week wait they have been 'selected' for layoff.

Hearing the news about this layoff today at Cisco. Here we go again. As an independent sales person, the company has no idea or does not care how this impacts my world every time this is done.... which is more and more frequent. I will pull every other product of of my bag before I offer Cisco to my clients unless it is all that's left in the bag.

Apparently employees were told more than 6 weeks ago there would be a 7% work force reduction in the US only. Since the layoff was 'leaked' earlier than intended, senior management would still require 6 to 7 weeks to determine 'who' was to go. There was a call for all associates who were told to 'do there job'. There was more weight put on the fact that there was a leak, than the cruel and extremely unusual impact on the workforce. YES, READ THAT AGAIN !

After seeing how the C suite handled COVID, there were a lot of kudos placed especially on the CEO and the Chief People Officer. What happened to those big hearted, common sense behaviors? For this failure, the Chief People Officer should have been included on the list of 7% let go. This terrible behavior, both cruel and unusual should be jumped on by many business schools looking for good case studies.

The BOD should take a very close look at how and why this occurred in this manner, and apply similar tactics to those earning the big dollars making these stupid decisions. Cisco has lost it's luster and SHAREHOLDERS should hear how human capital is treated at this company. The 7% workforce reduction is a drop in the bucket to overall variable admin expenses and even a smaller impact to the bottom line. It should be seen and told LOUDLY for what it was... Unnecessary and extremely cruel to have people sit and wait to see if they have 'been selected'. Chief People Officer should be released immediately per this investor!!!!!!

by
| 3991 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1uxCUPGp

13 replies (most recent on top)

Cisco plans budgets every year and shifts opex between groups. This "restructuring" results in some groups needing to reduce head count.

When a company has a major event like layoff they need to inform the public in advance to avoid insider trading.

Cisco has been doing this process every year for decades. There is no suprise here. This is like complaining that you did not know it would get dark at night.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pgl+1uxCUPGp

AI and software is what Cisco claims to be focusing on. Chuck wants to hang around with rock stars and the WEF cronies and has yet to put out a coherent strategy around either AI or software. Who is being held accountable for the absolute trainwreck of Acquisitions - over 90% failure rate

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zgy+1uxCUPGp

I still found it funny that at the Cisco beat chuck was wearing a $60k Rolex skydweller while telling everyone else there’s going to be layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1phj+1uxCUPGp

The CSE organization offers little to no value, yet another Maria dream child. The CSEs I know don’t even know what their job description is. By all means don’t let them go, that would mean you’re admitting that this customer success initiative failed. Cisco is dying under this leadership’s watch.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1srw+1uxCUPGp

The board won’t fire the elt for two reasons 1) Chuck is chair of the board 2) they are getting rich. Despite stock price su-king they get tons of RSUs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ygu+1uxCUPGp

I literally sold 1200 shares within the last hour. More to come.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gnb+1uxCUPGp

I divested my RSUs in Aug. I can no longer literally invest in Cisco.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @seb+1uxCUPGp

There's an old Italian phrase that is appropriate here...the fish stinks from the head.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bqh+1uxCUPGp

Yes we investors want better than this feckless lot in the ELT.

We're not going to be continuously led astray by their annual change to strategy. We want a change in strategy that removes CEO, C PPL off and CFO if that is deemed necessary by the Board. If you're going to be brutal remove those at the top that should be held accountable for a pi-s poor performance year on year.

We the investors that are/were employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rvr+1uxCUPGp

I loved how Chuckie looked so tired of listening to the tough comments and questions on the last beat. "We talk to you" he said - as though their incompetence is somehow diminished in light of this sham of performances year on year followed by them sitting on the other side of the US across screens and letting us know - we will let you go in a month. He might as well as said bye su-kas

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kks+1uxCUPGp

Handled COVID? hah! they lied then too, "No layoffs"..... lies, we had layoffs then too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tni+1uxCUPGp

Old news. Continue to work as an “independent sales person”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lis+1uxCUPGp

The absolute ba--s it took chuck to say on the check-in that the month wait was not explicitly designed to torture people into willingly leaving was truly impressive.

He really thinks every Cisco employee is that stupid.

Fire him. He has brought nothing but death to this company for years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @irl+1uxCUPGp

Post a reply

: