Thread regarding Charles Schwab Corp. layoffs

Leadership should read

Over the past five years, the environment has shifted dramatically. During the pandemic, remote work was handled well, and productivity remained high. However, everything changed in mid-2023 when leadership introduced return-to-office (RTO) mandates—despite having previously assured employees that remote work would continue. This was then followed with an announcement of reduce in workforce plans.

The RTO policy feels more like a tool for attrition than an effort to improve collaboration. Exceptions were promised but rarely granted. Leadership seems to hope that by forcing people back to the office, employees will quit on their own. Layoffs came next and now RTO tracking/RTO 5 days threats, with further “expense actions” still looming. Morale has plummeted, and it feels like leadership has deliberately fostered a toxic environment to push people out without having to pay severance.

The company’s slogans are empty and deceptive. The phrase “through the clients’ eyes” seems like it is more about misleading clients—showing them what the firm wants them to see—until regulators expose the truth. The firm’s recent $200 million fine (directly related to misleading clients) and lawsuits around the deceptive cash sweep program are proof that what clients see does not align with what’s really going on behind the scenes.

There’s also “The Power of One.” slogan. While it sounds empowering, it also works as an authoritarian motto—a way to enforce control and diminish dissent. There’s no room for the thoughts or opinions of anyone outside the highest-paid leaders, whose decisions seem disconnected from the reality of average employees’ experiences.

It’s especially hard to swallow the outgoing CEO’s claim (at a recent town hall) that his decisions are driven by “love” when his total compensation is close to 300 times the average employee salary. If his love is real, it must be a love of money and power, not people.

I understand that Schwab is a profit-driven institution so perhaps it’s naive to expect genuine care from leadership. At the end of the day “leadership” is driven by increasing the stock $ for the shareholders and they are some of the biggest shareholders.

It’s the pretending to care about employees and clients while undermining morale and misleading clients—that makes Schwab feel like a bad place to work (for some of us).”

by
| 3392 views | | 30 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vM7zeoj

30 replies (most recent on top)

Who ever wrote the paragraph below....get stuffed. You are obviously one of the sycophants worshipping a poor management team. total piece of Schwit.

Look, you really lose credibility when you start ranting about HR monitoring these threads. Like, you don’t actually think they have time for that, do you? I feel sad for you if you do. I’m sure you think everyone is out to get you, the helpless victim you always are and you’re headed into a giant spiral of misery for many years to come. I kinda just feel pity for the majority of the posters here. It’s Never shot possible layoffs, it’s about victim hood by one of the best organizations out there. Good luck out there. Life will continue to be hard for you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8g9+1vM7zeoj

Look, you really lose credibility when you start ranting about HR monitoring these threads. Like, you don’t actually think they have time for that, do you? I feel sad for you if you do. I’m sure you think everyone is out to get you, the helpless victim you always are and you’re headed into a giant spiral of misery for many years to come. I kinda just feel pity for the majority of the posters here. It’s Never shot possible layoffs, it’s about victim hood by one of the best organizations out there. Good luck out there. Life will continue to be hard for you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5wsc+1vM7zeoj

Monitoring? Maybe. Wasting time voting? Why.
It isn’t Reddit when things are filtered.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4fkq+1vM7zeoj

HR has been monitoring this forum for a long time especially since things like RTO and layoffs were announced here days before the company did. Every honest comment has been downvoted for a long time now. Leadership knows we are all on this site, they’re on it too. What’s interesting is all the votes were reset - looks like thelayoff caught onto what HR was doing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4day+1vM7zeoj

Honestly think OP manipulated the vote themselves. It would be beyond lame for HR to engage or even monitor this forum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4vgd+1vM7zeoj

Post from TheLayoff.com

Response:

The post isn’t about RTO, it’s a broader criticism of leadership at Schwab, which includes how poorly RTO has been handled.

It’s not as simple as “don’t like it, leave.” Many of us are committed to our roles, our teams, and our clients, but we also want leadership that respects employees, communicates honestly, and prioritizes more than just cost-cutting.

The critique here isn’t about avoiding the office—it’s about accountability, honesty, and the way leadership decisions affect morale across the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4tqd+1vM7zeoj

I wonder if monitoring this site & downvoting posts is actually a function for Schwab HR personnel? 204 downvotes does seem high especially (as mentioned previously) considering very few of the comments are critical or in disagreement with the OP”s original post. In fact the “leader here” comment that anyone criticizing leadership is a “thirsty camel” b/c leadership is faultless got a lot of downvotes.

Anyone in HR willing to spill the tea or someone that knows if bots work on this site. I’d guess bots do work here as they seem to be doing work all over the internet- despite entering the number to prove you’re not a bot! If Schwab actually spend money on bots for this site- that seems surprising too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4fwb+1vM7zeoj

Get with the program. RTO is here to stay. Don’t like it? Leave. Very simple.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3mof+1vM7zeoj
3 days, 458 reactions (+254/-204)... Nice work Schwab HR bots and meat keyboards

Since they got called out on this thread, I notice on the more recent threads, they are trying to be more subtle, with manual 1:1 downvoting for every upvote in the comments. Heavy on the reputation management.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3vzt+1vM7zeoj

3 days, 458 reactions (+254/-204)...

Nice work Schwab HR bots and meat keyboards

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3avo+1vM7zeoj

I&O just keeps getting worse. What do they even do these days?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ady+1vM7zeoj

@1dfz+1vM7zeoj

I think there's a fair point to Musk's interest in taxpayer money. Where it doesn't apply at Schwab is the more important point that Schwab is not efficiently firing the bad, promoting the good and strategically reorging. Schwab is keeping the worst ppl, losing the ones that can easily find jobs elsewhere, and completely failing to reorganize (since the pandemic, since layoffs, since RTO). They're focused on cutting costs, "streamlining shifts" and micromanaging the low-level associates (who do the most important work) while ignoring that they have TERRIBLE leaders and unnecessary layers that need to be removed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kes+1vM7zeoj
Come on! It's a Schwamily. A...fully...dysfunctional...Schwamily

The need to add a Schw- prefix to the beginning of everything at Schwab seemed quite childish to me at first, but then I was like whatever, I didnt think i had to read anymore into it. That should have been my first red flag though 🤢

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zow+1vM7zeoj

Come on! It's a Schwamily. A...fully...dysfunctional...Schwamily

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fth+1vM7zeoj

Can’t wait for it to backfire when way more people quit than they expect

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eqa+1vM7zeoj

Even the new DOGE understand this paradigm. Same plan with same intent.

“Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome: If federal employees don’t want to show up, American taxpayers shouldn’t pay them for the Covid-era privilege of staying home,” Musk and Ramaswamy wrote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dfz+1vM7zeoj
Welp, there are 147 down votes to the OP. Are there that many PLs on this board? Interesting.

That's why, if you look further downthread, you'll see the first few comments have called out the fraudulent Schwab bot activity occurring on this and recent posts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @shc+1vM7zeoj

Schwab went from great company to sh---y place to work. Greed, terrible senior leadership and a directionless vision got us here.

The real estate people are treating us like babysitters with handcuffs now.

Hope it was worth it Walt. You destroyed Chuck's reputable company in less than 10 years. And the EC.should all be investigated for fraud

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gzz+1vM7zeoj

Welp, there are 147 down votes to the OP. Are there that many PLs on this board? Interesting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dyr+1vM7zeoj

And leadership should lead but here we are.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yfz+1vM7zeoj

Typical Schwab, will stoop to any low. What a bad culture and environment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tng+1vM7zeoj

Wow, look at the voting numbers now, hot damn!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zyx+1vM7zeoj

TL is here to sell ads, ads, ads!!!

Controversy and a company downvoting a solid on topic post? Ads!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ovq+1vM7zeoj

They cannot silence us!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lcc+1vM7zeoj
A legitimate downvoter would find some flaw or error in OP’s post and comment. That there’s not one critical comment in two hours tells you everything you need know. Excellent post OP.

100% this. I wonder if there's a way to alert thelayoff.com about this so that they can investigate and block this activity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alu+1vM7zeoj

The leadership is using bots to downvote this is well known and a stupid tactic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qyt+1vM7zeoj

116 views and more than 60% voting in two hours on a Monday morning?

You have to be bat cr-p d-umb to believe they aren’t playing with the numbers. Look at other posts were participation is often sub 10%.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ids+1vM7zeoj

A legitimate downvoter would find some flaw or error in OP’s post and comment.

That there’s not one critical comment in two hours tells you everything you need know.

Excellent post OP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pnl+1vM7zeoj

Same commenter as below, adding that when I started my comment below, the downvotes were at -16, and now it looks like it has stopped at -41. The downvotes were literally increasing incrementally every half second before my eyes until they reached -41. Definitely not natural.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nbj+1vM7zeoj

Hey there, I agree 100% with this post. Just letting you know it looks like Schwab's social media army is mass downvoting your post. Literally, if you look at this post among the list of posts, you can see the downvotes occurring every half-second before your eyes. They have their social media team policing this post (and other recent posts) and downvoting them until they run out of social media staff and devices. Just FYI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @asn+1vM7zeoj

Post a reply

: