Thread regarding Seagate Technology Inc. layoffs

Just curious finally who was response for those interactions with Huawei?

Which eventually attract the jackpot of -300M fine from Uncle Sam.

by
| 1010 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vez7eAg

6 replies (most recent on top)

when's our next ethics training

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9zsj+1vez7eAg

And the Italian CFO said he didn’t give a f*** as he is not an American.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7gae+1vez7eAg

"Defend" means when they got caught red-handed, Dave tried to rationalize it away under the guise of sub-assemblies. But yeah I'm sure he encouraged it through and through.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7ulp+1vez7eAg

He did not defend it. He encouraged it. I was in the room ..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7byp+1vez7eAg

The CEO is 100% responsible. Not only did he face no personal consequences, he actually bragged that breaking the law was probably still worth it because Seagate made more than the 300M fine. And its you who has to sit and take ethics training for 2 hours every year and pretend Seagate is a serious company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1czp+1vez7eAg

The guy at the top is responsible. He was the one who defended it, even while our competitor played by the rules.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pnc+1vez7eAg

Post a reply

: