Thread regarding Follett layoffs

Ahhhh. Leadership....

So I am reading an article entitled "Kmart Sales Have Fallen Off a Cliff". It appears the management wizards have seen an unprecedented sales decline. In 2000, sales were $37 billion. Last year, a lusty $12 billion. Just think...those management minds are leading Follett. If I were you, I would bankroll any bonus you are fortunate to make.....just sayin.

by
| 787 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+BVUSSEe

12 replies (most recent on top)

Concerted Activity

You have the right to act with co-workers to address work-related issues in many ways. Examples include: talking with one or more co-workers about your wages and benefits or other working conditions, circulating a petition asking for better hours, participating in a concerted refusal to work in unsafe conditions, openly talking about your pay and benefits, and joining with co-workers to talk directly to your employer, to a government agency, or to the media about problems in your workplace. Your employer cannot discharge, discipline, or threaten you for, or coercively question you about, this "protected concerted" activity. A single employee may also engage in protected concerted activity if he or she is acting on the authority of other employees, bringing group complaints to the employer's attention, trying to induce group action, or seeking to prepare for group action. However, you can lose protection by saying or doing something egregiously offensive or knowingly and maliciously false, or by publicly disparaging your employer's products or services without relating your complaints to any labor controversy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6zz0+BVUSSEe

http://nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/protected-concerted-activity. Protected Concerted Activity

The law we enforce gives employees the right to act together to try to improve their pay and working conditions, with or without a union. If employees are fired, suspended, or otherwise penalized for taking part in protected group activity, the National Labor Relations Board will fight to restore what was unlawfully taken away. These rights were written into the original 1935 National Labor Relations Act and have been upheld in numerous decisions by appellate courts and by the U.S. Supreme Court.

If you have questions, please contact an Information Officer at your nearest NLRB Regional Office, which you can find on this page or by calling 1-866-667-NLRB.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6PG5+BVUSSEe

We are getting very close. We have the IP addresses, just need to trace them back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6xrm+BVUSSEe

If you fire me, I will happily file a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3CEX+BVUSSEe

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/technology/employers-social-media-policies-come-under-regulatory-scrutiny.html?_r=0

As Facebook and Twitter become as central to workplace conversation as the company cafeteria, federal regulators are ordering employers to scale back policies that limit what workers can say online.

Employers often seek to discourage comments that paint them in a negative light. Don’t discuss company matters publicly, a typical social media policy will say, and don’t disparage managers, co-workers or the company itself. Violations can be a firing offense.

But in a series of recent rulings and advisories, labor regulators have declared many such blanket restrictions illegal. The National Labor Relations Board says workers have a right to discuss work conditions freely and without fear of retribution, whether the discussion takes place at the office or on Facebook.

In addition to ordering the reinstatement of various workers fired for their posts on social networks, the agency has pushed companies nationwide, including giants like General Motors, Target and Costco, to rewrite their social media rules....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3HFD+BVUSSEe

MB Security - yeah, go for it. Drag Follett's dirty laundry out in public court. Let the family testify under oath! I would REALLY enjoy that! Can you say class action?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3N3K+BVUSSEe

We will identify each and everyone of you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3W72+BVUSSEe

They can't subpoena this information, it is a discussion board. And btw, the only time I go to this site is from Starbucks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mH5+BVUSSEe

Careful Anonymous107218, they might find out who you are. I've heard HR is looking into subpoenaing this site to collect IP addresses to identify all of us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1L8Y+BVUSSEe

They should quit for no value. I am riding this bad boy out. Working less than ever and getting paid better then ever. Nice combo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1RHB+BVUSSEe

You guys sound... motivated. Maybe you should just quit? At least the toxic atmosphere would lessen a little.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Sk3+BVUSSEe

It is evident they have little to offer. They have been here 2 years with very little to show for especially on the top side. Who can improve the bottom line by getting rid of employees and asking the remaining employees to pick up the slack. No new initiatives, no new projects...nothing. They came in and started a few off campus stores (which are gone) and the Dominican republic stores.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @PUA+BVUSSEe

Post a reply

: