Thread regarding Follett layoffs

Allow me the opportunity to shed light on the NE Book acquisition

Text book sales are trending down each of the last 10 years in the industry.

Amazon has entered the text book business which makes the sales pie shrink.

Text returns continue to cost margins.

States are beginning to apply pressure to reduce textbook costs.

Digital will most likely be replaced by a new and less expensive technology in the near future.

And with that said; Follett acquires 200 brick and mortar stores--please tell me how that makes sense. Especially if Follett had to assume the debt associated with those stores since we all know there is no such thing as 100% of any chain being all profitable. Top list growth is quite easy to create with an acquisition but converting it to growth in the profit column is an entirely different animal. I'm just saying.

by
| 810 views | | 17 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+BXERhZQ

17 replies (most recent on top)

Exactly. I was terminated, and although discriminately I'm glad that decision was made. I love my new job and would NEVER return to Follett under ANY circumstances.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6UaH+BXERhZQ

Amazon has 200 new bullseyes to target.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6GTF+BXERhZQ

I was laid off. Follett will never hire any of its employees back for many good reasons. That ship has sailed. Move on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @489q+BXERhZQ

To much blame is given to MLS. The worst decisions made by Follett over 2.5 years were made by DG, GT and SS. Their decisions were made by them and not MLS. The hiring of fellow kmart/sears/omax were from them. The letting go of good talent was them. The outsourcing of many IT jobs to India was them. The transformation won't be complete until the family makes a change to remove them as well. They don't and never will fit the Follett culture. Employees cannot forget what they have done. We need to start fresh.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4A31+BXERhZQ

Who would go back? I took a sizeable pay cut and I still wouldn't go back! They hated me once, what's to stop them from hating again. Jack asses!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3pKw+BXERhZQ

Yeah right, like they would ever ask anyone back! Craziest theory I've heard yet. Pride goeth before the fall.......they will NEVER contact any ex-Follett associate and rehire them. That group would rather believe that the layoffs were totally correct, and never admit they were wrong about all of those eliminations. Even if it means a downhill plunge to extinction. Good luck to the pitiful little group left to deal with all of the great Nebraska bookstores. Hire a few grunts at low wages to pick up some of the burden, but no one of any consequence will ever behind back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3I5J+BXERhZQ

An appreciation event for those we shouldn't have let go?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3RRd+BXERhZQ

Successful companies set up a program to keep ex-employees engaged to see if they can be brought back or can be a good reference for new talent. We're at the point now where we have to recognize the sunk-cost of the talent we've let go and try to get the best ones back and if needed, eat a little crow in the process. The stakes are too high and operations and IT need all the help they can get.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yyg+BXERhZQ

Too bad we had to go on this amazing magical mystery tour with MLS for 2 ½ years before this became apparent to senior management. Too bad we lost the people that knew the business and the ADC is now full of books with no value. Do you miss MD yet? Outsourcing jobs best left in-house. How about identifying those a**holes and laying them off?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2Bp5+BXERhZQ

Dead horse? This industry is not changing in the next 10 years. Digital is immaterial at this point. Used books will drive the market as they always have. GT knows this and making the necessary decisions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2FAL+BXERhZQ

Why would anyone buy a dead horse? did it come with a free buggy whip?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @26Ew+BXERhZQ

if Follett paid more than a 4 multiple -- they they got hosed. Let one of the K-Mart losers run the off campus stores since they have experience with cheap, dying businesses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1PKI+BXERhZQ

fred1982!

July 1982 was a very special year for the Follett Corporation wasn't it? From that point until our departures, the Company was dynàmic! I guess they never really knew what they had until we left?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qAI+BXERhZQ

You still rock! And yes 1982. You don't look a day over 35!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8px+BXERhZQ

Original? Do you mean from July of 1982?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @MAW+BXERhZQ

NE Book made money selling clothing made in 3rd world countries. If Follett uses their current vendors, prices will rise and buyers will go to the on campus stores.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @29D+BXERhZQ

"Especially if Follett had to assume the debt associated with those stores"

You don't assume debt in a deal like this. Nebraska Book wholesale division is still there with less debt after shedding the stores.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Y85+BXERhZQ

Post a reply

: