It's unjust and they just attempted it with ITT and it was backed out. Meaning that ITT was not ceased from VA funding. Vets are treated well and provided an opportunity to earn a good education so there shouldn't be a need to force them out of an option to attend a school that fits their adult schedules. Vets are incredibly intellectual individuals. I doubt they would make a stupid decision when it comes to using their funds for something they don't feel is worthwhile. They already get a nice tuition discount. They also don't have to use much loans so there should be no reason to borrow loans. It's an option and some decide to do so because it's easy access to money and then find themselves in debt. Credit is a bad American habit across the board. I mean, looks at our own country. As a society, we are how much in debt??
3 replies (most recent on top)
Kevin from ITT blew the VA guy to keep funding. With jizz dripping down his face, his wrinkled shit stained suit torn in a few spots the VA guy gave him the thumbs up. Its the only answer that makes sense.
Highly doubt it. More than likely an agreement would be made to increase better retention efforts and student career outcomes. Vets will be required to sign an agreement that would require them to ensure graduation or pay a penalty and so will the institution. The institution may suffer a penalty if programs do not lead to gainful employment. They don't just cut funding they first create a settlement and provide a reporting timeline. Try again though. I'm sure that's all wishful thinking on your part.
@440--you are lying to everyone, even yourself. VA funding IS going to cease by year's end, and more than 4K employees will be relieved of their jobs. Stop making excuses for this predatory diploma mill. It's all a colossal shell game played by the executives and you sound like an investor hoping to recoup the thousands you lost. The egg will be on your dumb mug when this place is shuttered.