Thread regarding Follett layoffs

Web based CT?

Anyone know why the web based CT conversion was postponed? I mean aside from Follett screwing up yet another roll out? Or is it same ol' same ol'?

by
| 1711 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+IcK3qkn

11 replies (most recent on top)

It is a piece of sh-- that cost 15 millions dollars.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9cnl+IcK3qkn

There is no accountability by leadership for their bad decisions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5toj+IcK3qkn

INTERSOFT!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4yus+IcK3qkn

Holy auto correct. Sorry.

But to sum up what it is: Wonky design, ruined features, horrible lag.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2utw+IcK3qkn

We have it at our store. Holy pile of dokie, Batman.

Let'stand take a system that runs well, for the most part and "enhance" it by putting it on the web. We'really still going to have you run 2001 Internet, but it should work fine. Lol.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2sqi+IcK3qkn

Has Sanjeev S. ever NOT failed?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2srz+IcK3qkn

Follett family cares about the money they saved, not the value they receive for the money spent. Money saved = bigger dividend check.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1efa+IcK3qkn

When are they going to learn these offshore projects never see the light of day. How many years and millions and millions spent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ych+IcK3qkn

Another failure by another offshore development team. Definition of insanity - doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dyr+IcK3qkn

That was probably developed by RT team of no talent hacks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qpx+IcK3qkn

Because it's a steaming pile that can't handle summer school traffic, much less rush traffic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fvg+IcK3qkn

Post a reply

: