Thread regarding IBM layoffs

“Co-located” Folks Listen - There are few things you should hear about

Source: Watching IBM - For those being “co-located” there are some things you should know. Executive management has been compiling a list of FAQ but has instructed mid-manager it is not to be shared.

As unexpected situations arise, the answers to the questions are being changed to side with the company and not the employee. Case in point: They never anticipated an employee declining the move AND giving notice the day the official calls were made.

Advice: Make sure your decision to move, whatever it is, is in writing and separate from any other communication related to your decision to leave the company. Also, make sure your decision to move is BEFORE you communicate any other intentions.

Also, in these FAQs that are not being shared – you won’t know the answer if you don’t ask the question – If you do relocate and then leave the company in 6 months after relocating, you will owe 100% of the moving expenses to the company. If you leave the company between 6 months and one year, you will owe the company 50% of the moving expenses.

There is also a calculation being used to determine whether you are eligible for relocation assistance. The figure that is being circulated is 50 miles. If you live within 50 miles of your assigned workplace, there is no M&L offered.

What is not being circulated is this: If you live 30 miles from your current work location and you commute that 30 miles daily and your new assigned work location is 75 miles away from your home, they are subtracting your current commute of 30 miles from your new commute of 75 miles: 45 miles = no M&L. Just ask, ask, and ask as many questions as possible.

Try to ask and receive answers via email or some writing. Our leaders are being encouraged to have conversations – it’s much harder to document a phone call.

by
| 1257 views | | no replies yet | Reply
Post ID: @OP+LQE4yNL

There are no replies in this thread yet. Be the first to post a reply below:

Post a reply

: